SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: portage who wrote (20113)6/7/2003 4:36:14 PM
From: Mannie  Respond to of 89467
 
Saturday, June 7, 2003 · Last updated 11:09 a.m. PT

Questions linger over Iraq weapons claims

By JOHN J. LUMPKIN
ASSOCIATED PRESS WRITER

WASHINGTON -- Before the war, the Bush
administration portrayed Iraq as full of killer
poisons with strange names and deadly effects,
which terrorists could get hold of and unleash on
U.S. cities. Those claims and fears have not been
borne out so far.

Was the intelligence regarding Iraq inaccurate or
distorted between when it was gathered and
presented to the world? Congress is looking into
the matter. Prime Minister Tony Blair's
government in Britain is facing similar scrutiny.

A former State Department intelligence official,
who viewed classified intelligence gathered by the
CIA and other agencies about Iraq's chemical,
biological and nuclear programs during the run-up
to the war, accused the administration of distorting
intelligence and presenting conjecture as fact.

"What disturbs me deeply is what I think are the
disingenuous statements made from the very top
about what the intelligence did say," said Greg
Thielmann, who retired in September. He was
director of the strategic, proliferation and military
issues office in the State Department's Bureau of Intelligence and Research.

On Friday, the head of the Defense Intelligence Agency acknowledged he had no hard evidence of
Iraqi chemical weapons last fall but believed Iraq had a program in place to produce them. The
assessment suggests greater uncertainty about the Iraqi threat than the administration indicated
publicly.

CIA Director George Tenet, Secretary of State Colin Powell and top Pentagon officials have
defended their pieces of the intelligence picture, saying they provided accurate assessments.

Many top U.S. officials contend their prewar assertions will yet be borne out. They say Iraq
remains too dangerous to conduct a thorough search, but a new hunt is getting under way.

Prewar statements from President Bush, Powell and intelligence officials offered many of the
specific conclusions that drove the United States and Britain to invade Iraq. Most have yet to be
validated.

"Our conservative estimate is that Iraq today has a stockpile of between 100 and 500 tons of
chemical weapons agent," Powell said at the United Nations in February.

In a paper released in October, U.S. intelligence agencies said that Iraq had begun "renewed
production of chemical warfare agents," probably including mustard, sarin, cyclosarin and VX.

Chemical weapons have not been found in the part of Iraq that was controlled by President Saddam
Hussein's government.

Intelligence officials said Saddam would disperse his chemical weapons among his Iraqi Republican
Guard units, which would use them if the government were about to fall. This apparently did not
happen.

Powell suggested military units had biological weapons in the field.

On May 30, Lt. Gen. James Conway, the top Marine in Iraq, said, speaking about the hunt for
chemical and biological weapons: "We've been to virtually every ammunition supply point between
the Kuwaiti border and Baghdad, but they're simply not there."

The prewar intelligence paper said Iraq had established "a large-scale, redundant and concealed"
biological weapon agent production capability, which included mobile facilities.

Allied forces in Iraq have found two truck trailers equipped with fermenters. The CIA and Defense
Intelligence Agency said last week they concluded the vehicles probably are parts of a mobile
biological weapons production facility. Bush seized on the finds as proof Iraq had prohibited
weapons.

No complete production system has been found, and tests showed no trace of biological agents in
either trailer.

"So far it seems as if all the leads that have been followed up have come to nothing. ... So many
false claims have been made in the past, it can only be politically driven. Responsible governments
take time to investigate," said Alex Standish, editor of Jane's Intelligence Digest in London.

"It's like the boy who cried wolf. The credibility of these claims is shot."

Powell also had told the United Nations that "numerous intelligence reports over the past decade
from sources inside Iraq" indicated "a covert force of up to a few dozen Scud-variant ballistic
missiles."

None has been found.

U.S. allegations that Iraq was trying to develop a nuclear weapon have also not been verified.

Much discussed were some high-strength aluminum tubes Iraq tried to import. The CIA argued they
were for centrifuges essential to a nuclear weapons program. Experts from the State and Energy
departments said they were for conventional artillery rockets, Thielmann said.

No centrifuges have been reported found.

In his State of the Union address, Bush said that Britain had learned that Saddam "recently sought
significant quantities of uranium from Africa."

The claim rested significantly on a letter or letters between officials in Iraq and Niger that were
obtained by European intelligence agencies. The communications are now accepted as forged.

The administration also suggested Iraq supported terrorists, including members of al-Qaida.

The al-Qaida connection was built around the movements of Abu Musab Zarqawi, a senior associate
of Osama bin Laden. Zarqawi received medical treatment in Baghdad in 2002 and supported an
Islamic extremist movement in Kurdish Iraq, outside Saddam's reach.

A midlevel associate of Zarqawi was detained near Baghdad after the war. Zarqawi himself remains
at large. Some reports indicated al-Qaida operatives had sought chemical and biological weapons
expertise from Iraq, but there was little evidence Iraq supplied any.



To: portage who wrote (20113)6/7/2003 9:03:19 PM
From: jlallen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
LOL!

Another idiot post....keep up the good work........

I sure hope the democraps run on this Bush lied crapola in 2004......