Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (170797)	6/7/2003 7:15:29 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1580109

Ted, Is it because you've never seen how honorable people behave and you're confused? Honorable? It seems you're the one who's confused. According to a report I've read, the editors were forced out by their employees. Raines knew about the scandals going on and had the power to stop them, but didn't because of his "politically correct" agenda. That, plus his management style that has been called "bizarre" at best, all got ignited once Jayson Blair spilled the beans. The fact that Raines is not popular at the Times has been common knowledge for ten years. He's a big ego. However, no one forced him to resign; after all, most employees at the Times have big egos. Raines is not an "honorable" person. He has damaged the reputation of one of the most respected newspapers in the world, and his resignation is well-deserved. Sorry but I have to call them like I see them......its Jayson Blair who damaged the rep of the the Times, not Raines. Raines did not tell Blair to go and lie......Blair did it all on his own. ted