Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Fred Levine who wrote (70417)	6/8/2003 4:35:18 PM
From: zonder	Respond to of 70976

Fred - I see little reason to go into the whole debate with you, given that my last four attempts to do so ended with you not answering my posts. Summary: Nobody is saying Saddam is a good guy. Everybody is saying Bush administration lied and cheated and slandered those who opposed his lying/cheating ways (ex: France) in his need to invade Iraq for reasons that had little to nothing to do with how much of a bad guy Saddam is. By the way, re your posts being "absolutely consistent" - you seem to think that is a Good Thing. Obviously, that is not necessarily so. You have been consistently wrong in thinking this invasion had anything to do with Saddam being a bad guy and his "WMDs". All I would like to know, really, is if you are beginning to doubt the wisdom of that belief, given the fact that your own government is now accepting the possibility that they may never found those soi-disant "WMDs", and that their intelligence may have been faulty. In other words, that they were wrong in invading Iraq on the basis of WMDs.