SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : All About Sun Microsystems -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Vikas Deolaliker who wrote (54514)6/11/2003 2:58:57 AM
From: Dinesh  Respond to of 64865
 
Hi Vikas

My apologies for a late reply. Somedays I miss SI.

The Lawrence/Central comparison was strictly in response
to a post by Charles Tutt that Sun benefits from Linux by
virtue of its Cobalt line. Since then of course I have
figured out that CT operates only at a soundbite level, so
you are using something out of its context. (Although one
could argue that the shop has a positive return.)

The link you posted - doesn't indicate IMHO that Solaris is
the answer when people want to move up from Linux. It also
picked a very narrow segment of the market - 3D graphics.
(Isn't that obvious by the fact that they instead chose SGI)
Are we going to argue with sub-billion market segments?

Sparc isn't getting a boost from Itanium's woes. There is
Operton, and there will be Linux too. There isn't enough
economy of scale for maintaining Sparc. JIMHO, again.
But this has nothing to do with "Linux helping Sun" which
was my original question.

Java is suppodely "universal" so this has nothing to do with
Sparc, x86, Linux, Solaris, etc. Nobody equates Java with
"gotta buy a Sun". This too is not material here.

Still the same question -- is Linux helping Sun? And, by
"helping" I mean "net margins". That's the only help that
counts for me. I couldn't care less if Sun ported
MS Windows to Sparc and packed a reboot-pin in the box
if it made handsome profits.

Regards
-dinesh