SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: tejek who wrote (170849)6/8/2003 2:46:25 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1583682
 
Ted, Please explain how this was taken out of context.

All too often, "cast the first stone" has been used to justify sinful behavior. The misunderstanding is the premise that if mortal man cannot condemn others for sinful behavior, then the sin must be OK or at least left unpunished. But the Bible clearly states that sin is NOT OK and MUST be punished. The punishment has been commuted thanks to the grace of Jesus, but sin is still NOT OK.

And when I talk about punishment, I'm talking about the divine punishment for all sin: "The wages of sin is death." The consequences of sin still apply. Witness the death of David's love child with Bathsheba, even after he confessed the affair and cover-up to God and begged for his forgiveness. David kept his kingdom and his life, but lost his son and lost moral authority.

In the case of Clinton, he tried to mitigate his sin and his cover-up to his private life. At the same time, he tried to avoid the impact to his political career, his legal liability, and his reputation, all of which are valid consequences of his sin. That's why I said in my original message, "Maybe Bill ought to have considered that when he lied." (#reply-19012338) He knew that the consequences went well beyond his own private life, and that's why he chose to lie.

Tenchusatsu

P.S. - Ironically, I'm now late for church. Cya! ;-)