Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (100784)	6/8/2003 11:50:15 PM
From: Bilow	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 281500

Hi Hawkmoon; Re: "There are certainly no records detailing the destruction of those 6,000 missing warheads." I guess it's too complicated for you to imagine that the weapons were destroyed without that being recorded, LOL. Or, maybe, records were kept, but the UN felt that they were not sufficiently believable. It doesn't really matter cause that's not what Bush is getting hung (in editorials all over this country) for. Bush is in trouble for lying about his secret proof that WMDs existed. Re: "But of course, were such a document to exist, I'm sure you'd be the first to declare it to be absolutely credible, right, even without supporting evidence to back it up." Again, you're making me out to be an apologist for Saddam. A nice straw man argument. But the best evidence for the non existence of Iraqi WMDs in March 2003 is the simple fact that none were used in war and none have been found since then. This despite all the intense efforts of the military to find them. Remember the "Where's the Beef" ad back a few decades ago? Now it's "Where's the WMDs". -- Carl