Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Donkey's Inn -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mephisto who wrote (6924)	6/10/2003 1:43:09 PM
From: Mephisto	Respond to of 15516

"This page was a consistent critic of the Clintons' ethics problems, but the former president's defenders should feel free to point out what kind of national outcry we would be hearing from talk show hosts and Congressional Republicans if anyone had tried to misuse the government's antiterrorism machinery this way during the last administration." Editorial:Diverting the War on Terrorism Source: The New York Times June 10, 2003 Copyright 2003 The New York Times Company nytimes.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We know. The Times really had it in for the Clinton's, didn't you? I recall Maureen Dowd's vicious articles. A few of us questioned her veracity about Hillary and the gifts but you kept on publishing Dowd's anti-Clinton articles after Bush took office. You went on a tirade about Bill Clinton's pardons, but you said very little when Jr. Bush hired former Iran-Contras, pardoned by Bush Sr, to work in Bush Jr.'s White House. In short, you turned your newspaper into a national scandal sheet when Bill Clinton was president. The paper was a disgrace. Parents complained that they were embarrassed to let their kids watch or read the newspaper. You should be ashamed.