Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Precious and Base Metal Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: que seria who wrote (12180)	6/11/2003 4:07:33 AM
From: VAUGHN	Respond to of 39344

Hello que seria There isn't enough information to make a call one way or another although kimberlites have certainly been found in the region. Having said that, the NR strikes me as very vague and to some degree suspect as it describes the anomaly as "highly magnetic" which kimberlites typically are not unless emplaced in a much less magnetic host such as limestone which this NR makes no reference to. Typically kimberlites are magnetic lows while (and Eric can speak to this in more detail) a breccia pipe or porphry deposit with say copper sufides, PGM's or AU might well read as highly magnetic. All very speculative though as I said, very little hard information and hardly worth a NR. Regards Vaughn