SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Canadian Diamond Play Cafi -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: jrhana who wrote (927)6/10/2003 7:56:20 PM
From: Letmebe Frank  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 16204
 
Hello JRhana: Heres an excerpt:

"Despite the initial enthusiasm, the hopeful geochemistry will not
automatically translate into toutable diamond counts. There have been several
examples of promising indicators failing to lead to significantly
diamondiferous kimberlites, despite years of trying, including programs at
Yamba Lake and MacKay Lake in the Northwest Territories, although the Ekati
and Diavik mines must be considered geochemical success stories.
The Thunder kimberlite was intersected at a depth of about 11 metres, and the
drill was still in kimberlite at a depth of 87 metres. Meanwhile, the
Lightning kimberlite is about six kilometres to the north of the first find.
The target was the first of many prospective targets that could be drilled,
and Shear and its partners plan to test at least 15 of them in the coming
weeks. They could be waiting for diamond counts from a cluster of Churchill
kimberlites by summer."

It's good to see finding pipes can still excite the market, but it will take some good macro's to really light the fire. There's time to get in IMHO. It's still gambling buying Shear. It sure is great when a gamble pays off, and those of you in on Shear congrats!

Excuse me JR, but have you been investing in diamonds for a long time?



To: jrhana who wrote (927)6/11/2003 3:48:50 AM
From: VAUGHN  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 16204
 
Thanks jrhana

I had a few conversations with Pam at the annual Geoscience Forum over the years but never would have guessed she had a promoters mentality nor an abiding interest in diamonds.

Good luck to her and all of us.

Regards

Vaughn