SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : DON'T START THE WAR -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: GUSTAVE JAEGER who wrote (24763)6/11/2003 2:38:07 PM
From: Hawkmoon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 25898
 
Too bad you flunked your biological warfare course... Here's clue from Robin Cook, Britain's former Secr of State:

For one thing, Robin Cook was FOREIGN SECRETARY, not Secretary of State. So obviously you flunked political science.

Secondly, if Chemical weapons have a "limited shelf life" then why the hell did the US spend so much time and money incinerating it's stockpile (dating from the '50s through '70s).

It might have a reduced effectiveness, but when some of this stuff only requires a small amount to kill someone, it's merely a case of semantics.

So for Robin Cook to say something so stupid is surpassed only by someone like yourself believing it.

Hawk



To: GUSTAVE JAEGER who wrote (24763)6/11/2003 2:39:00 PM
From: Hawkmoon  Read Replies (7) | Respond to of 25898
 
Too bad you flunked your biological warfare course... Here's clue from Robin Cook, Britain's former Secr of State:

For one thing, Robin Cook was FOREIGN SECRETARY, not Secretary of State. So obviously you flunked political science.

Secondly, if Chemical weapons have a "limited shelf life" then why the hell did the US spend so much time and money incinerating it's stockpile (dating from the '50s through '70s).

It might have a reduced effectiveness, but when some of this stuff only requires a small amount to kill someone, it's merely a case of semantics.

So for Robin Cook to say something so stupid is surpassed only by someone like yourself believing it.

cwwg.org
cwwg.org

And now ask yourself whether we have found the infrastructure in Iraq to substantiate the destruction of 1,000 tonnes of chemical weapons?

Hawk



To: GUSTAVE JAEGER who wrote (24763)6/12/2003 3:43:35 AM
From: GUSTAVE JAEGER  Respond to of 25898
 
glitch