Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Heinz Blasnik- Views You Can Use -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GraceZ who wrote (2435)	6/11/2003 9:09:25 PM
From: yard_man	Respond to of 4912

You aren't even rational for goodness sake. Can you or can you not define what you mean by rigor?? I'll tell you what I think rigor is: It states explicitly what is axiomatic and proceeds logically to build a foundation from there. I am familiar with the ideas of men who are taught in basic macroeconomics -- you are going to have a tough time finding someone among those who has created as rigorous a conceptual framework for the study of economics as Mises' has. It has rigor in every sense of the word -- you can always quarrel with the abstractions chosen if you have knowledge of them. My thinking isn't sloppy -- you just don't want to define what you mean. You say that everyone who posts here misinterprets even the Austrians but you are largely ignorant of what the tenets are or you would criticize the abstractions or approach but you don't do either Instead you simply state a layman's understanding of a few theories you have heard from other laymen. Go back to either one of those sections regarding why price stability is not something to be aimed at -- which I linked and criticize Mises' formulation -- tell us why it is wrong and you are right. Otherwise save the bandwidth.