Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (171019)	6/11/2003 8:23:38 PM
From: i-node	Respond to of 1583406

I must say, though, that the double-standard demonstrated by the feminists is crystal-clear, whether or not Clinton did rape Broderick. Yes, you're right. Susan Estrich was on Fox last night after Broaderick. She talked about how she was, herself, a rape victim and knew all about it. But she was asked if she believed Broaderick and she, of course, said no. The thing is, Broaderick is totally credible. Totally. The only thing one could bring up is the fact that she did deny it occurred in her first affidavit. But Jeez, she had seen what Clinton did to all these other women when they confronted him. And, as she pointed out, years after the alleged rape, he mysteriously shows up to ask her "forgiveness" three short weeks before beginning his run for the presidency. I mean, it really is just too much to be a coincidence. I recognize the guy could never be tried or convicted -- as Tim pointed out, it is he-said, she-said, but that doesn't mean the woman isn't credible. If you get a chance to see it again, it is well worth watching...