SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: frankw1900 who wrote (101233)6/12/2003 6:33:28 PM
From: Bilow  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
Hi frankw1900; Re: "You've said this before. How do you know this? Have you got documents?"

Of course I don't have "documents". I'm the linkmaster, LOL.

(a) Sharon is a member of the Likud party. (Do you need a document to prove this?)

(b) Debka is a Likud output. Our own Israel expert agrees:

Nadine Carroll, March 19, 2003
My impression is that debka is a "leak sink", mainly for Likud politicians and Israeli military intelligence. #reply-18722856

(c) Bush's actions have left the Arab leaders smiling broadly, but Sharon is in such trouble that Israel's newspapers ask how long before he is assassinated.

(d) That Bush no longer trusts Sharon is demonstrated by direct quotes on Haaretz: (This is in addition to those smiles on the Arabs' faces, and the articles demonstrating the hatred towards him from the far right in Israel.)

Source, quoting Bush: 'We have a problem with Sharon'
haaretzdaily.com

-- Carl

P.S. This is a hell of a lot better evidence than Bush has that there were WMDs in Iraq, LOL.