Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Big Dog's Boom Boom Room -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Archie Meeties who wrote (23732)	6/12/2003 7:23:02 PM
From: Tomas	Respond to of 206109

<<Maybe somebody has read the abstract or summary of the study, but the entire article (including the authors discussion) will not be available until it's actually published.>> Archimedes, the 1000 year climate study already HAS been published in Energy and Environment: ninetta.ingentaselect.com The full article is available here in pdf-format: nam.org@CategoryID=1161@TPT=Reconstructing+Climatic+and+Environmental+Changes+of+the+Past+1000+Years%3A+A+Reappraisal A short summary of the 1,000 year climate study: nam.org <<Perhaps the authors have a different take on the full implications of their study?>> No, they agree completely. I recommend this article by the same authors: Lessons & Limits of Climate History: Was the 20th Century Climate Unusual? marshall.org and Humanity may not be to blame for global warming after all By Sallie Baliunas, an astrophysicist at the Harvard-Smithsonian Centre for Astrophysics news.scotsman.com