Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Wolf speed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Yogizuna who wrote (6851)	6/13/2003 11:29:36 AM
From: DiB	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10714

Well, yeah, a quarter of the market cap has been wiped out. Eric should just buy some shares now and withdraw his suit. <g><ng> I wonder if such things are considered to be legal...

To: Yogizuna who wrote (6851)	6/13/2003 11:33:41 AM
From: Ron	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10714

Have been holding some CREE shares since early '90's. Dumped them. First time without CREE in long term account. Just too risky, for now, imho.

To: Yogizuna who wrote (6851)	6/13/2003 11:34:00 AM
From: pompsander	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 10714

Shareholders have a right to demand that the board immediately determine if this is a "family feud" that has gotten out of control and is engulfing the company's interests (big boys have big toys) or if something went on here that, family relationshps aside, is part and parcel of proper management of the company. This is the perfect kind of case where truly independent directors take immediate control of the matter, working with the legal committee and legal counsel (so there is no question of who counsel reports to) and stems the damage. If this is just the Hunter brothers having at it for forty years of "mother always liked you better", the Board can move it away from the firm. If it truly is something more.....then N. Hunter need to be put on the sidelines even more than he currently is.