SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: DuckTapeSunroof who wrote (414854)6/13/2003 3:14:45 PM
From: jlallen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
LOL!

Paranoia????



To: DuckTapeSunroof who wrote (414854)6/13/2003 4:48:52 PM
From: Skywatcher  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
speaking of paranoia
COMMENTARY
9/11 Detainees' Treatment Casts a Deep
Shadow
Ashcroft used a cloak of secrecy to violate the rights of hundreds.

By Morton H. Halperin and Ken Gude, Morton H. Halperin is
director of the Washington office of the Open Society
Institute. Ken Gude is a policy analyst at the Center for
National Security Studies, the named plaintiff in the Freedom
of I

The abuses against the immigrant detainees who were
rounded up after Sept. 11 have been amply detailed in
a report released by the Justice Department's inspector
general.

Many of the detainees were kept in unnecessarily harsh
confinement, denied access to counsel and family and
not informed of the charges against them for weeks or
months. Some were beaten. They were automatically
denied bail and many were jailed even though they
were never charged with any serious crime. The
inspector general's report also confirms that many of
those detained were never suspected of terrorism but were simply caught up in
the wide net cast after 9/11.

But the ultimate abuse, in our opinion, was the shroud of secrecy ordered by
Atty. Gen. John D. Ashcroft over the entire process.

On Sept. 20, 2001, he directed the department's chief immigration judge to keep
secret all information about the detainees. As a result, the government refused to
disclose the names of those arrested and then closed their hearings to the public.
This made any outside review of the Justice Department's actions virtually
impossible; the department was not accountable to anyone outside the
government until the inspector general's report was released this month.

And the report is only the tip of the iceberg. The inspector general examined the
cases of only 119 out of the 762 aliens detained.

Before the report's release, Ashcroft repeatedly asserted that at no time were the
rights of the detainees violated. He told the Senate Judiciary Committee on Dec.
6, 2001, that "all persons being detained have the right to contact their lawyers
and their families." That claim was false. The inspector general "found that the
Bureau of Prisons' decision to house Sept. 11 detainees in the most restrictive
confinement conditions possible severely limited the detainees' ability to obtain,
and communicate with, legal counsel."

The attorney general has also claimed that the uncompromising application of
punitive detention before trial was justified because it targeted suspected
terrorists. But the inspector general said the FBI made little or no effort to
distinguish between detainees who were the subjects of the Sept. 11 investigation
and those who were encountered by investigators "coincidentally." That failure
caused the prolonged and extremely harsh detention of individuals whom the
government never suspected of terrorist activity.

Remarkably, even in the face of a 198-page report detailing numerous rights
abuses, the Justice Department still maintains that the law was "scrupulously
followed and respected."

Where in the law does it allow for the physical abuse of individuals in government
custody?

The government remains stubbornly determined to keep secret the identities of
the detainees. It has appealed a federal court's order to release the names; the
appeals court's decision is pending. And it is clear from the Justice Department's
"no apologies" response to the inspector general's report that it is not taking
seriously the findings or recommendations.

Congress should demand that the Justice Department release the names of the
detainees, and it should act to prohibit secret arrests and secret hearings in the
future. Unfortunately, at the House Judiciary Committee hearing, members never
even addressed the secrecy of the arrests.

In his opening statement on June 5, the attorney general very powerfully read
aloud names of those who were murdered on Sept. 11. I hold out hope that at
some appearance before some congressional body, some attorney general will
read aloud names of those who were detained, jailed and beaten in the aftermath
of that tragic day.

CC