SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : The Boxing Ring Revived -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (6416)6/13/2003 6:52:53 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 7720
 
Larry Niven, a science fiction writer, postulates in one of his novels a society where failure to take drugs necessary to control mental illness is a death penalty offense. That seems rather extreme. But the basic idea is right.

The problem with that is its not always a clear cut case of take drug A to safely and effectively stop behavior X. Sometimes its Take drug A to hope to control X, while causing side effect Y, take drug B to try and deal with Y but cause mental or physical problem Z for which there is no good treatment available.

In the hypothetical future that Niven writes about such drugs may be safer and more effective and the disorders may be more precisely diagnosed but its not always such simple now, in the current real world.

BTW - Dishonest adds or committing to many minor traffic violations was a death penalty act at some points of Niven's future history, when transplants where safe and easy but there wasn't enough organs to meet the demand for transplants. Even with so many capital offences there still was not enough organs so some criminals became "organleggers" who would kill people to sell their organs on the black market. If they left fingerprints they would just change out their hands...

Tim