Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: KLP who wrote (101529)	6/14/2003 9:38:06 AM
From: Sig	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

<<Is it better for the terrorist groups to be destroyed now....or later when they have more dangerous weapon >> Thats a neat summary.. One could ask why is the US involved now, when there many more Africans fighting or dying or starving? Its a matter of timing and applying our limited resources in the goals to eliminate Terrorism Africa is not a threat to world peace, and the Terrorists there are not organized or easily identifiable In the Israel/Pal conflict we did not start it, it is a threat to peace in the entire region, the timing is right as it is in the worlds news and eyes, and the next step is very clear as the conflict is presently confined to Israel versus the Hamas. And if the Hamas had a more terrible weapon they would use it. The roadmap has done one important thing, it showed just who is standing in the way to peace in the region. Arafat and other Arabs have funded, armed, and encouraged the group in the past . If he goes back to doing that, then he is the blockage on the road and will be removed. Sig@dailyrag.com . .