SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: frankw1900 who wrote (101596)6/15/2003 1:25:57 AM
From: LindyBill  Respond to of 281500
 
Presidents Try and Try Again for Mideast Peace
By ELISABETH BUMILLER - NEW YORK TIMES

WASHINGTON - President Bush said the United States would "ride herd" on peace in the Middle East, conjuring up an image of himself as the American cowboy cracking a whip at some unruly cattle, in this case Mahmoud Abbas and Ariel Sharon.

That was barely two weeks ago, at the summit meeting in Aqaba, Jordan, where both sides pledged to take initial steps toward peace and hope triumphed briefly over history. But today, with the near collapse of that effort in the violent spasms of last week, does Mr. Bush have some other tricks in his saddlebag? What, exactly, did "ride herd" mean?

Apparently it did not mean that Mr. Bush would personally immerse himself in the daily ups and downs of the Middle East. Although he issued regular exhortations demanding restraint from Mr. Abbas, the struggling new Palestinian prime minister, and from Mr. Sharon, the prime minister of Israel, he did not make a single call to the region, even after Mr. Sharon's forces tried to assassinate a leader of the Islamic militant group Hamas and a Palestinian suicide bomber killed 16 on a bus in Jerusalem.

In fact, the president is still searching for an effective level for his own personal involvement. For now, he has put his representatives in charge of managing the day-to-day crises. As Mr. Bush himself said to reporters after the summit, recounting his conversations with Mr. Abbas and Mr. Sharon: "I used the expression `ride herd.' I don't know if anybody understood the meaning. It's a little informal in diplomatic terms. I said, `We're going to put a guy on the ground to ride herd on the process.' "

That guy is John S. Wolf, the assistant secretary of state for nonproliferation, who was to land in Israel on Saturday to lead a team of American monitors to help both sides carry out the peace plan. His immediate task, an administration official said, was to meet with Muhammad Dahlan, Mr. Abbas's new security chief, about strengthening and reorganizing the Palestinian security forces to try to stop terrorism.

Assisting Mr. Wolf, a senior administration official said, are some 10 C.I.A. operatives whose job is, in part, to identify who among the security forces can be trusted and who might have ties to terrorists.

Reorganizing and training Palestinian security forces with C.I.A. help, an effort that dates from the Oslo accords of 1993, is still considered by many Middle East experts to be crucial to any solution. But the process has a troubled history, and some in the Bush administration have been leery of the idea. Middle East experts say some C.I.A.-trained security forces later joined up with terrorists, for example. But now Mr. Bush seems ready to try again.

"It's the details that in the end are going to disrupt this process," said Martin Indyk, a Middle East negotiator under President Bill Clinton. "And that detail is at the heart of the problem." Mr. Indyk, who is now head of the Saban Center for Middle East Policy at the Brookings Institution, has suggested making the West Bank and Gaza an international trusteeship, with American-led troops in charge of security, but the idea has not taken root among Mr. Bush and his aides.

Another official charged with riding herd is Secretary of State Colin L. Powell, who spoke by telephone to Mr. Abbas and Mr. Sharon on Thursday, urging them to get peace talks back on track. He will travel to the Middle East this week. Condoleezza Rice, the national security adviser, is said to be considering a trip there too.

Mr. Bush, meanwhile, is playing the role of the C.E.O. president, the delegator-in-chief who is loath to be dragged into details that could end in spectacular failure. But Zbigniew Brzezinski, national security adviser under President Jimmy Carter, who brokered a peace between Egypt and Israel, said Mr. Bush needs to be willing to spend more political capital than he has so far.

"Bullying Abbas is easy and pandering to Sharon has some short-term political benefit, but the net effect is to make the president look like a wimp internationally," Mr. Brzezinski said in an interview last week. "If you're going to take the plunge, you have to swim all the way," he added. Mr. Carter made peace, he said, with a constant and visible personal commitment.

Mr. Bush's advisers respond that the former president most in their thoughts is not Mr. Carter but Mr. Clinton, who threw himself into peace talks and even tried to duplicate Mr. Carter's signature success at Camp David. Mr. Clinton left the presidency, they say, with little to show for his efforts but the 32-month Palestinian intifada, which began during his term, after the peace talks broke down.

"We had a situation under Clinton where he did everything ? he was on the phone all the time to the leaders, and every time a diplomat came to town he would meet with them," a Middle East diplomat said. "He was like the State Department desk officer for the Israeli-Palestinian issue."

Mr. Bush's advisers say that Mr. Bush, who stood so prominently between Mr. Abbas and Mr. Sharon in Jordan less than two weeks ago, has since then been engaged behind the scenes. There have been constant phone calls and meetings with Mr. Powell and Ms. Rice, they say. The president was also to have regular briefings this weekend in Kennebunkport.

"Presidential capital should be husbanded and expended only when necessary," said Aaron David Miller, the president of Seeds of Peace, who served as a Middle East negotiator under six secretaries of state and is a former Middle East specialist under Mr. Bush. "Part of riding herd is that you don't get down in the weeds, but you make sure that the process keeps moving through a variety of instruments that the president has at his disposal."

Nonetheless, Mr. Miller said, Mr. Bush and his advisers were still "genuinely struggling with how to turn the president's new determination into a 24-7 diplomacy to diffuse the current crisis."

In other words, Mr. Bush now finds himself on the same spot occupied by every president for the past quarter-century: struggling to strike the right balance between doing too much and too little when riding herd in the Middle East.
nytimes.com



To: frankw1900 who wrote (101596)6/15/2003 8:35:14 AM
From: KLP  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Frank...I like Mark Steyn, and am posting his entire article, thanks to your link. If we get two a day, I'm behind several for the last week, and this one is worth it...Thanks for finding it!

Rummy was right: it was the same vase, 170,000 times over
By Mark Steyn

(Filed: 14/06/2003)

Five weeks ago, I wrote in this space that the sack of the Iraqi National Museum was "as mythical as the great Jenin massacre of exactly a year ago". This was apropos my deranged colleague Boris Johnson's endearingly insane claim that the looting of Iraq's antiquities had been planned by a cabal of American art lobbyists.

Well, I swanned off to Iraq for a couple of weeks of sun, sand and anthrax, and returned to find that Boris had changed his story. He still thought some great sack had taken place, evidently declining to take my word that the number of missing items was not 170,000 but 38. But now it wasn't the Florida real estate kings who'd pilfered the stuff. Instead, according to his June 5 column, "respect for the common weal fell so low that Iraqis themselves actually ransacked the national museum".

No explanation was attempted for the revised plotline. There was no Victoria Principal moment, with Boris wandering into the shower and discovering that the previous season's columns had all been a bad dream. I suppose his series continuity girl would point out that, despite re-casting the perpetrators, the root cause remained the same: the indifference of the philistine Yank conquerors.

That was the upshot of Simon Jenkins's column in The Times, in which he predicted that 2003 would go down in history as the year of "the destruction of the greatest treasure from the oldest age of Western civilisation, the greatest heritage catastrophe since the Second World War. We who claim to crusade for civilised values could not summon one tank to defend their earliest repository." Etc, etc.

Current official number of missing items: reduced from 38 to 33 and going down faster than proverbial interns in old Bill Clinton jokes.

The one guy to get the Iraqi Museum story right from the get-go turns out to be not a professional journalist, but our old friend, the philistine warmonger Donald Rumsfeld. Rummy observed at the time that the networks kept showing "the same picture of some person walking out of some building with a vase". But it was the same vase "over and over and over". The same vase, 170,000 times. Rummy was right.

You want a heritage catastrophe? At the very moment the Baghdad Museum was being non-sacked, workers at the University of Toronto threw out 280 boxes of colonial and Indian artefacts dating back to the 15th century. What's left of them is now deep in a landfill in Michigan. I'm a Torontonian, so that's my heritage in there. Any takers? I thought not. Harder to pin on Bush and Blair.

Interestingly, Toronto is not only more culturally desecrated than Iraq; it's also more diseased. There have been 238 cases of Sars in Toronto, with 32 deaths. There have been 66 cases of cholera in Basra, with three deaths. Basra public health officials, assuming there are any, are doing a much better job of controlling cholera than Toronto public health officials are of controlling Sars.

The Ontario health guys, who sound more like a gung-ho Chamber of Commerce, keep announcing they've got Sars licked and then it goes and infects a big bunch of new hospital patients. And meanwhile the Canadian media keep raving about what a great job the Toronto healthcare folks are doing, and then return to ululating about the massive humanitarian catastrophe about to engulf Iraq.

Remember Jayson Blair? Fired from the New York Times because all his stories filed from Tuscaloosa and Pocatello were actually written in his bedsit with a bit of local colour lifted from the internet? What exactly did he do wrong? He copied what everybody else was saying, and it was mostly true and he saved a bundle on expenses.

On the other hand, media organisations spent a fortune sending vast teams halfway across the world to Baghdad to come back with a news event that never happened, and then paid their heavyweight commentators even more dough to amplify the hogwash. I mean, in what way is Simon Jenkins's column any less risible than that Iraqi information minister announcing that the American aggressors' stomachs are now being roasted in hell? And which ought to be the greater media embarrassment - the sacking of Jayson Blair or the non-sacking of the Baghdad Museum?

Ah-ha, you cry, but they still haven't found any WMD! Well, who says? This week, Channel 4 News Diplomatic Correspondent Lindsey Hilsum revealed that she'd stumbled on Scuds - you know, the things Saddam didn't have - hidden in residential areas in Baghdad, but she didn't mention it on air because "we would have been thrown out the next day".

Jayson Blair reporting what's happening without going on location: bad. Channel 4 not reporting what's happening but staying on location: fine'n'dandy.

Bear that in mind when Jon Snow sneers at some Pentagon guy about why they haven't found anything yet. Maybe Lindsey found them last month, but she'd rather not say.

Previous story: Modern isn't the same as good, Prime Minister
Next story: Reader, I'm just another sulky author