Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Big Dog's Boom Boom Room -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: quehubo who wrote (23801)	6/15/2003 4:48:05 PM
From: Area51	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 206198

I tend to agree with quehubo and the Raymond James take beacon1.rjf.com and the Bank of America take that Tomas also posted It's good that natural gas prices have increased enough to kill demand so that winter supplies will be adequate. As appealing as it may seem, it is not really in anybody's interest to have natural gas supplies depleted in the winter, as this would just result in massive demand kill as people switch from natural gas heating to electrical heat pumps.

To: quehubo who wrote (23801)	6/16/2003 9:42:06 AM
From: Archie Meeties	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 206198

Que, the difference that jumps to mind is that 2000 could support bull market valuations, whereas 2003 will not. Making comparisons based only on storage, price, etc. do not take into account the big change in valuations that have occurred since 2000. Besides, I think our situation now is more like 2001. The injection picture has changed and the most likely trend is for continued pressure on gas prices. I'd say with another 2 weeks of big injections gas might be under $4. That type of pricing will crush everything in sight.