Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dale Knipschield who wrote (70424)	6/18/2003 5:08:18 AM
From: zonder	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 70976

If nobody had seen Saddam's sons before, their existence was only rumoured, then your country invaded Iraq on the basis of what they now admit was "faulty intelligence", and no proof of their existence was uncovered even after the whole country was in US control AND it was widely known that anyone who came up with proof of their existence, even a clue, could write his own ticket... ....then yes, we could doubt the existence of Saddam's sons. But that is not the case, is it? I hope you can see the difference between the issues of Saddam's sons, whose existence is documented beyond proof, and those soi-disant "tons and tons of WMDs". Even your administration now admits "faulty intelligence". I don't know what you are trying to say with this flimsy comparison...