SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (20567)6/17/2003 2:29:24 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
<<...next up: CIA plants evidence of WMD inside Iraq (watch)...>>

Do you really trust them..? NOTHING would surprise me with this Administration -- they are desperate and are working overtime to justify a war...Maybe we should impeach Bush AND Cheney and get a new management team in power...CONgress is supposed to be like the country's Board of Directors, right...? Are they holding our President and his team accountable for their actions...? Are we getting 'Enron Style Management'....?

-s2@Lookingfornewleadership.com



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (20567)6/17/2003 2:32:10 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 89467
 
Message 19034205



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (20567)6/17/2003 5:03:00 PM
From: T L Comiskey  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
"next up: CIA plants evidence"

Now yur Tonkin...lol
T



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (20567)6/18/2003 10:18:02 AM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 89467
 
Dereliction of Duty
_______________________________

By Paul Krugman
Columnist
The New York Times
Tuesday 17 June 2003

Last Thursday a House subcommittee met to finalize next year's homeland security appropriation. The ranking Democrat announced that he would introduce an amendment adding roughly $1 billion for areas like port security and border security that, according to just about every expert, have been severely neglected since Sept. 11. He proposed to pay for the additions by slightly scaling back tax cuts for people making more than $1 million per year.

The subcommittee's chairman promptly closed the meeting to the public, citing national security — though no classified material was under discussion. And the bill that emerged from the closed meeting did not contain the extra funding.

It was a perfect symbol of the reality of the Bush administration's "war on terror." Behind the rhetoric — and behind the veil of secrecy, invoked in the name of national security but actually used to prevent public scrutiny — lies a pattern of neglect, of refusal to take crucial actions to protect us from terrorists. Actual counterterrorism, it seems, doesn't fit the administration's agenda.

Yesterday The Washington Post printed an interview with Rand Beers, a top White House counterterrorism adviser who resigned in March. "They're making us less secure, not more secure," he said of the Bush administration. "As an insider, I saw the things that weren't being done." Among the problem areas he cited were homeland security, where he says the administration has "only a rhetorical policy"; failure to press Saudi Arabia (the home of most of the Sept. 11 terrorists) to take action; and, of course, the way we allowed Afghanistan to relapse into chaos.

Some of this pattern of neglect involves penny-pinching. Back in February, even George W. Bush in effect admitted that not enough money had been allocated to domestic security — though (to the fury of Republican legislators) he blamed Congress. Yet according to Fred Kaplan in Slate, the administration's latest budget proposal for homeland security actually contains less money than was spent last year. Meanwhile, urgent priorities remain unmet. For example, port security, identified as a top concern from the very beginning, has so far received only one-tenth as much money as the Coast Guard says is needed.

But it's not just a matter of money. For one thing, it's hard to claim now that the Bush administration is trying to hold down domestic spending to make room for tax cuts. With the budget deficit projected at more than $400 billion this year, a few billion more for homeland security wouldn't make much difference to the tax-cutting agenda. Moreover, Congress isn't pinching pennies across the board: last week the Senate voted to provide $15 billion in loan guarantees for the construction of nuclear power plants.

Furthermore, even on the military front the administration has been weirdly reluctant to come to grips with terrorism. It refused to provide Afghanistan's new government with an adequate security umbrella, with the predictable result that warlords are running rampant and the Taliban are making a comeback. The squandered victory in Afghanistan was one reason people like myself had a bad feeling about the invasion of Iraq — and sure enough, the administration was bizarrely lackadaisical about providing postwar security. Even nuclear waste dumps were left unguarded for weeks.

So what's the explanation? The answer, one suspects, is that key figures — above all, Donald Rumsfeld — just didn't feel like dealing with the real problem. Real counterterrorism mainly involves police work and precautionary measures; it doesn't look impressive on TV, and it doesn't provide many occasions for victory celebrations.

A conventional war, on the other hand, is a lot more fun: you get stirring pictures of tanks rolling across the desert, and you get to do a victory landing on an aircraft carrier. And more and more it seems that that was what the war was all about. After all, the supposed reasons for fighting that war have turned out to be false — there were no links to Al Qaeda, there wasn't a big arsenal of W.M.D.'s.

But never mind — we won, didn't we? Maybe not. About half of the U.S. Army's combat strength is now tied down in Iraq, facing what looks increasingly like a guerrilla war — and like a perfect recruiting device for Al Qaeda. Meanwhile, the real war on terror has been neglected, and we've antagonized the allies we need to fight that war. One of these days we'll end up paying the price.

truthout.org



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (20567)6/18/2003 12:06:56 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 89467
 
Blogging is a good marketing tool for business

masshightech.com

By Elizabeth Dinan
Mass High Tech
06/16/2003 08:20 AM

Blogs are good for business.

That was the message at Boston’s Weblog Business Strategies conference on June 9, where consensus said today’s bloggers are leading the pack to what will be the next great marketing tool. That is if more people find out what a blog is, then actually start blogging.

A blog is an online, interactive discussion, posted daily in reverse chronological order and written in conversational style. Most are personal blogs, few are business blogs, while all are open to public perusal and participation.

Leading a panel discussion titled, “Strategies and Tips for Business Blogging Success,” John Lawler told a small but enthusiastic group that bloggers are estimated to number between 100,000 and 1.5 million. But he calculates only about 20 percent of the people who’ve heard him preach the gospel of blog knew what the heck he was talking about.

Lawler has spun three businesses out of blogging himself — as a business blog consultant, author of “BlogAnswerMan’s Big Book of Business Blogging” and host of BlogAnswerMan.com, a blog he boasts achieved top 10 search engine status on Google, MSN and Overture within 72 hours of launch.

That’s why he says blog stands for “Better Listings on Google,” one of the reasons businesses should consider blogging as a marketing tool.

Meantime, conference organizer Kathleen Goodwin predicts big things for the power of the biz blog, calling these early stages “like 1987,” while expressing the “sense that it’ll never be like this again.”

Panelist Halley Suitt, author of the blog “Halley’s Comment,” discussed her blog, a mostly personal account which began with the end of her father’s life. She describes its evolution into a “sexy, spicy, saucy” weblog that’s led to her writing a fictionalized story about a corporate weblog gone bad for Harvard Business School, due to be published this fall.

Her blog now leads her nemesis, astronomer Edmond Halley, on a Google search. In fact, Halley’s Comment comes up in the No. 1 position from a Google search of “Halley.”

Don White, director of communications for Piedmont Preferred Properties, used the blog forum to describe how he’s enlisted between 5,000 and 6,000 real estate brokers to blog about their business, a forum he says is cheaper to launch than a Web site and more easily managed.

Meantime, Beverly’s Groove Networks is thought to be the first to publish a corporate blog policy with company president Ray Ozzie posting blog guidelines for employees last August. The Groove blog guidelines include avoiding mention of intellectual property, the suggestion that employees disclaim responsibility for blogging on the company’s behalf, and that Groove “may request that you temporarily confine your website or weblog commentary to topics unrelated to the company.”

Back at the Blog expo, Major Chris Chambers relayed his experience as a blogger for the U.S. Army while soldiering in Afghanistan, by reporting he was careful to “self edit.” Calling the armed forces “risk adverse in terms of public image,” he said Army brass determined a blog would be a good way to “reconnect” with youth.

Already offering a download action game, America’s Army, for this purpose, Chambers’ blog included first-hand accounts of frontline Afghani action from his laptop, accompanied by digital images taken from the window of a military Humvee.

“It was personal to a degree, but always in line with our strategy,” he said. “It seemed like a natural way to connect players of our game with a real person and real experiences. We ran it like a business, but gave it away for free.”

Posting under the pseudonym “Scorpio” for security reasons, Chambers said the Army “looked hard” without success for an American serviceman in Iraq to also blog for the action game. At the other end, the Army connected game players with game developers.

Chambers said the blog was successful in attracting players to the game, evident by an increased number of hits to the site. Dialog indicated they were reaching the demographic they wanted — young males with an interest in the military and guns.

The Army major’s business blog illustrates the potential that for-profit businesses could realize, as did a report from one conference attendee who said he found a paying sponsor for his business blog.

Lawler told attendees they’re leading the non-blogging world by five years.

“We’re so far ahead,” he said. “It’s phenomenal.”

Still, predict experts, blogs started with the tech-savvy audience, will move to the media and next, to business.

With that said, Lawler predicts it’ll be a while before we see a blog for Cheerios.