Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : DON'T START THE WAR -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Raymond Duray who wrote (24881)	6/18/2003 5:49:32 AM
From: Hawkmoon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25898

Could it be that Bush and Blair are naked aggressors and ought to be tried as war criminals? I sure think so. As does this writer, Robert Scheer: Maybe if the war was solely about the belief, by the US, that Saddam possessed WMDs. But you would have to charge every member of the UNSC with war crimes as well since they ALSO believed Iraq possessed these weapons. Or could it be that, because Saddam FAILED to comply and fully provide accountability for his weapons programs and inventories, that he brought all of this upon himself and "his" people?? Hmmm... Maybe Saddam needs to be charged as a war criminal too?? Of course, I'm sure you think such a solution is obviously uncalled for.. Saddam's your hero.. Hawk