SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (2280)6/18/2003 4:43:53 AM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793939
 
Here is a line from the "Washington Post" columnist, Fred Hiatt.

From the midterm election to the sunlit carrier landing, the war seems to have worked maddeningly well for George Bush.


Isn't it a shame the the war has gone "maddeningly well?" To bad it didn't go badly, then it would be easier to beat him next election. We see this attitude from the left all the time, don't we?



To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (2280)6/18/2003 10:29:28 AM
From: JohnM  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793939
 
I gather you've now joined RC in deciding not to discuss Krugman's presumed lying. Fine by me. Again, if you wish to make the charge, I'll be happy to discuss it.

Just to go back to RC's original charge, it was that Krugman was telling fibs. If the charge is simply meant to float out there as a belief, fine, let it go, and no one will take it seriously. But if RC wishes it to be taken seriously, the claim needs to be justified. Not point to some website which lists stuff.

I have no problem, to repeat, with you or RC, using the website as a resource to find "lies", bring one forward and we can discuss it. But to be convincing it would need to carry the full cite, to use your term, of the original column so the text and context could be checked.

It's not up to me to demonstrate he's not lying; it's up to you or RC to demonstrate that he is. Since RC started this one.

Have at it.