SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : WHO IS RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT IN 2004 -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: American Spirit who wrote (2489)6/18/2003 10:53:33 AM
From: PROLIFE  Respond to of 10965
 
KERRY’S “GORE PROBLEM”

Will He Say Anything To Get Elected?


You don’t want to risk the reputation that you don’t just push the envelope, but you tear it here or there. If you do that, you get the Al Gore problem . . .” (Stuart Rothenberg On John Kerry As Quoted In Glen Johnson, “Doubt Cast On Kerry’s ‘PAC-Free’ Claim,” The Boston Globe, 6/12/2003)

KERRY FIRST PAC-FREE SENATOR?

On Campaign Website, Kerry Claims To Have Run “The Nation’s First Successful PAC-Free Senate Race” In 1984. (John Kerry For President Website, www.johnkerry.com, Accessed 6/12/03)

Well, Not Exactly . . . In 1978, David L. Boren (D-OK) was elected to the U.S. Senate without PAC money, and in 1980, Warren Rudman (R-NH) also was elected to the Senate without taking PAC money. (Glen Johnson, “Doubt Cast On Kerry’s ‘PAC-Free’ Claim,” The Boston Globe, 6/12/2003)

KERRY’S FIRST SPEECH ON SENATE FLOOR WAS ON ROE V. WADE?

Kerry Claimed First Speech On Senate Floor Was About Abortion. “As I said 18 years ago in my maiden speech in the U.S. Senate: ‘the right to choose is a fundamental right … neither the Government nor any person has the right to infringe on that freedom.’” (Senator John Kerry, Remarks At NARAL 30th Anniversary Dinner, 1/21/03)

Well, Not Exactly . . . “[T]he Congressional Record shows that Kerry’s first speech in the Senate, on March 19, 1985, was made in opposition to President Reagan’s push to build 21 MX missiles.” (Glen Johnson, “Kerry Admits To An Error In Boast About 1st Speech,” The Boston Globe, 5/1/03)

KERRY’S BEEN CLEAR HE’S NOT IRISH?

Kerry Says He’s Been “Clear As A Bell” Regarding Irish Heritage. “Kerry acknowledged that some voters in Massachusetts, the nation’s most Irish-American state, may have had the impression that he had Irish roots. … ‘I’m sure some people see the name and say, “Hey, I think it’s this or that,” but I’ve been clear as a bell,’ Kerry said. ‘I’ve always been absolutely straight up front about it.’” (Michael Kranish, “Search For Kerry’s Roots Finds Surprising History,” The Boston Globe, 2/2/03)

Well, Not Exactly . . . In 1986, Kerry introduced a statement referring to his Irish roots into the Congressioanl Record : “Mr. President, while St. Patrick’s Day holds special meaning for those Americans of Irish descent ... For those of us who are fortunate to share an Irish ancestry …” (Senator John Kerry, Congressional Record, 3/18/86)

KERRY INTRODUCED FIRST FEDERAL GAY CIVIL RIGHTS BILL?

On His Senate Website, Kerry Claimed He Introduced First Federal Gay Civil Rights Bill. “In 1985, he introduced what his Senate Web site now calls the first federal gay civil rights bill …” (David Nather, “Kerry’s Complex Record And His Pursuit Of The Presidency,” CQ Weekly, 4/24/03)

Well, Not Exactly . . . “It [Kerry’s Bill] is not actually the first such bill in Congress — Rep. Bella Abzug (1971-77) introduced a version in 1975 …” (David Nather, “Kerry’s Complex Record And His Pursuit Of The Presidency,” CQ Weekly, 4/24/03)

KERRY SUFFERS FROM ASTHMA?

Kerry Implied He Started Using Inhaler As Result Of Asthma. “Many of the parents and some of the children in the group [at the roundtable discussion] complained of asthma. ‘Until I went to Washington, I had never had asthma in my life,’ Kerry said in response. He said pollution in the city has prompted him to use an inhaler like those used by some of Roxbury residents.” (Glen Johnson, “Kerry May Make GOP Wealth A Campaign Issue,” The Boston Globe, 4/23/03)

Well, Not Exactly . . . “In an interview afterward, Kerry clarified his remark by explaining that he used an Albuterol inhaler for common springtime allergies, but his condition is not serious enough to limit his physical activity. ‘I rarely use it; I haven’t used it in months,’ he said.” (Glen Johnson, “Kerry May Make GOP Wealth A Campaign Issue,” The Boston Globe, 4/23/03)



To: American Spirit who wrote (2489)6/18/2003 11:32:55 AM
From: Glenn Petersen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10965
 
Wind farm is an issue for Kerry

By Sam Dealey

hillnews.com

A renewed plea by presidential hopeful John Kerry (D-Mass.) to redouble efforts at using renewable energy has elicited criticism that the senator has failed to push adequately for such innovations in his own backyard.

Speaking in Cedar Rapids, Iowa, last Friday, Kerry called for a “new Manhattan Project” to decrease the nation’s dependence on foreign energy sources and go easier on Mother Nature.

“We can generate more and more of our electricity from wind, the sun, forest and farm products,” Kerry said. “I believe we can and should produce 20 percent of all our electricity from renewable sources by 2020. Twenty by 2020 — now that’s a clear vision for America.”

It turns out, however, that it’s not such a clear vision for all.

A huge proposed wind farm on Horseshoe Shoal, seven miles off Nantucket Island, has met with fierce resistance, including from some of Kerry’s well-connected constituents and neighbors, who look askance at the idea of peering at a 130 whirling turbines from their luxurious vacation retreats.

Some residents in nearby Cape Cod and Martha’s Vineyard, replete with well-heeled castaways and summer vacationers, say the wind farm would mar the view of the sound.

Kelly Benander, a spokeswoman for Kerry’s presidential campaign, said the senator is “waiting to hear about the results from the environmental impact statement.”

She said he will announce his decision when he sees the results. Benander declined to say whether Kerry would endorse the plan if the environmental impact studies turn out favorably for the massive project, known as Cape Wind.

Vocal opponents are not waiting for such results. They include retired CBS anchorman Walter Cronkite, who has a home in Martha’s Vineyard, and members of the Kennedy family.

Energy Management Inc. (EMI), a renewable energy firm, sponsors the project. When up and running, the farm’s turbines would produce 75 percent of the Cape and island’s electricity with no pollutant emissions, waste discharge or water consumption.

Massachusetts lawmakers at both the federal and state levels have lent a sympathetic ear to their outraged constituents. A number of roadblocks have been thrown up to try to delay the project or ban it outright.

Several environmental impact studies have been commissioned, including one by the Army Corps of Engineers.

Kerry is in the spotlight on the issue because he is a major Democratic presidential candidate and a veteran advocate for renewable energy. The senator and his family summer on the Cape.

His equivocal stance on the project has drawn fire from some critics, including several longtime supporters.

“Kerry is the one who really needs to be called out on this stuff,” said Kert Davies, research director of Greenpeace. “He’s been pretty mum so far. We don’t know where he stands.”

Davies added, “He’s obviously very pro-renewable energy; he knows the climate better than almost anyone in the Senate. And by that logic, he should be in favor of this project being implemented.”

Supporters of the wind farm say the ongoing environmental impact study is a pretext for those who hope to kill the project.

“Typically, when people are trying to assemble the capital for a project they have a window, and if things don’t get moving then the window just melts away,” said Myron Ebell of the Competitive Enterprise Institute, a free-market environmental think tank. “It’s a typical strategy. Whenever you’ve got a project you don’t want, you just delay it to death until the capital investment goes somewhere else.”

Greenpeace’s Davies agreed. “It’s like any tactical fight,” he said. “They’re pushing every channel. It’s the same stuff we use when we want to block something. You go from every angle, because you never know which one will stick.”

“Ultimately,” he added, “it’s a Nimby argument.” Nimby is an acronym for “Not in My Backyard.”

James Gordon, president of EMI, is well aware of the ironies involved.

“There is a certain minority of folks on the Cape that have a problem with the visual impact, as modest as it is,” he said. “It is difficult to come out and say you’re a supporter of renewable energy until you may have a distant view of it.”

Gordon declined to speculate on Kerry’s stance on the project. “I’m convinced, frankly, that when public officials and legislators see the results of Cape Wind’s environmental impact statement, they’re going to support the project,” he said.

In addition to Greenpeace, the Natural Resource Defense Council, the World Wildlife Fund, the Conservation Law Foundation and Friends of the Earth have spoken favorably of the project. Even some commercial competitors have voiced their support.

“Basically the only groups that have come out ardently opposed to it are some of the animal welfare groups that got told or misled early on that this is going to kill critters,” said Davies of Greenpeace. “We’ve been watching them like a hawk. So far they’re playing by the rules and more, going beyond what would be typical corporate behavior.”

He added, “They’re really trying to dot every ‘i’ and cross every ‘t’.”

The Cape’s population has tripled from 90,000 since the 1960s, when the last power source — a heavy oil fuel fire plant — was built.

“People think if you live in the right area you don’t have to put up with anything,” Ebell said. “Well, where are they going to get their energy? From little squirrels in wheels?”