SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Corvis Corporation (CORV) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Glenn Petersen who wrote (1656)6/22/2003 5:04:03 AM
From: tech101  Respond to of 2772
 
Report Explores Internet Growth Puzzle

JUNE 20, 2003

Internet traffic growth is still growing, according to a report released earlier this week by researchers at the University of Minnesota. Unfortunately, the revenues associated with it don't seem to be keeping pace.

Andrew Odlyzko, director of the Digital Technology Center at the University of Minnesota, who authored the report, says Internet traffic is steadily growing about 70 percent to 150 percent per year. On a conference call yesterday to discuss the results, he said traffic growth slowed moderately over the last couple of years, but it had mostly remained constant for the past five years.

These results help dispel claims by some researchers and equipment executives that Internet traffic has actually been declining (see Internet Growth Slows ). In June 2001, John Roth, former CEO of Nortel Networks Corp. (NYSE/Toronto: NT - message board), blamed his company's $19.2 billion loss on shrinking Internet traffic (see Sour Grapes of Roth ). He quickly back-peddled from that statement.

Despite growing demand, carriers still haven't figured out how to make money from their growing data networks. Although the volume of Internet traffic exceeds voice traffic on carrier networks, voice is where the money is.

In 2002, Internet services, including dedicated access, dialup modems, and residential broadband, generated a total of $35 billion in revenues for carriers in North America. In total, carriers generated about $354 billion in revenue in 2001, with similar figures in 2002. Revenues from cellular services grew to about $80 billion in 2002.

The transport portion of the network has become commoditized, making it difficult for carriers to increase margins in this market, says Odlyzko. New growth is expected from the edge and access portions of carrier networks. But he says it will come at a high price.

“It’s a nagging concern for service providers,” says Stephen Kamman, an analyst with CIBC World Markets. “Basically, this report shows us that there is still a significant amount of uncertainty in the market and that we should expect some more lumpiness going forward.”

For equipment providers, the news is a mixed bag. IP vendors are likely to get a slight boost as carriers spend what little money they have on upgrading access and edge aggregation networks (see Router Vendors Look for Bottom ). But the picture is less rosy for optical transport manufacturers and component vendors. Because carriers over-invested during the bubble, much of their networks, especially the optical core, will not need to be upgraded for a long time. Optical vendors have felt much of this pain already (see Long-Haul Lag Lingers ).

Odlyzko blames the “irrational exuberance” of the late 1990s for the current financial woes of carriers today. Back in the bubble days experts claimed that Internet traffic was doubling every 100 days.

Comments from executives like Bernie Ebbers, the former CEO of WorldCom Inc. only helped fuel the fire, says Odlyzko. He cites a presentation Ebbers made at Boston College in March of 2000 where the CEO told audience members that WorldCom's capital spending would exceed $100 billion by 2003. (Yes, friends: billion.) Two years later Ebbers left his CEO post under a cloud of scandal, and WorldCom filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (see WorldCom's Ebbers Resigns and WorldCom Files for Bankruptcy ).

According to Odlyzko's report, which uses data that dates back to 1990, traffic actually only doubled every 100 days from 1995 to 1996. He says that carrier executives, Wall Street analysts, and journalists perpetuated the myth long after traffic growth had stabilized.

“The problem was that those business plans had been formed in willful ignorance of actual demand,” he says. “The Internet simply did not grow as fast as had been predicted. Because of the misunderstanding of what consumers wanted, the whole industry crashed in spite of its technical excellence and plentiful capital expenditure.”

The report, which surveyed service providers in North America, found that, in aggregate, the Internet backbone carried a total of 2,500 to 4,000 terabytes worth of data in 1997 and between 80,000 and 140,000 terabytes in 2002. Odlyzko says the illegal swapping of peer-to-peer content was one of the largest drivers in overall traffic growth in 2002 (see P2P Plagues Service Providers ).

— Marguerite Reardon, Senior Editor, Light Reading



To: Glenn Petersen who wrote (1656)7/31/2003 3:27:57 PM
From: tech101  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2772
 
An Article About the Deal of Broadwing Broadband Business:

Corvis' Deals Raise Questions by Sarah Cohen, Jun-18-2003 at thedeal.com

In the battered optical equipment sector, Corvis Corp., with its clean balance sheet and rich cash reserves, appears on the surface like an odds-on favorite to survive the telecom slump.
But analysts say several questionable acquisitions raise concerns about the prospects for the Columbia, Md., company's core equipment business.

......

In February, with its stock dwindling to 61 cents per share, Corvis said it would join St. Louis buyout firm Cequel III LLC to buy Broadwing Inc.'s broadband services unit for $129 million in cash and $375 million in operating liabilities. (Broadwing, a Cincinnati-based telecom, has since changed its name to Cincinnati Bell Inc.)

The acquisition of a broadband services provider by Corvis, a maker of optical equipment, has baffled analysts. One called it "the stupidest thing I've heard of in ages."

Corvis manufactures optical switches, devices for moving data and voice signals within networks, and related technology. It competes with industry heavyweights including Lucent Technologies Inc. of Murray Hill, N.J.; Alcatel SA of Paris; and Ciena Corp. of Linthicum, Md. By contrast, Broadwing uses optical equipment to provide Internet and phone service.

Following the Broadwing deal, analysts Simon Leopold of Merrill Lynch & Co. and Hasan Imam of Thomas Weisel Partners LLC in San Francisco suspended coverage of Corvis pending a clearer description of the company's business model.

Leopold, who has not resumed coverage of Corvis, called the acquisition "puzzling" because of the poor synergy between broadband services and telecom manufacturing.

Another source was more blunt. "The acquisition is ridiculous," the source said. "If Broadwing can't make it work, a company without scale or operational experience has no business taking it on."

Imam earlier this year discontinued coverage of Corvis, citing the company's identity change. But last week he resumed rating it and became the first analyst to embrace the deal.

"The acquisition makes sense from a pure financial engineering point of view, using cash on the balance sheet to buy an undervalued telecom asset with a significant revenue run rate," Imam said. "This is especially true since pure cash isn't yielding much these days, and networking equipment revenues are very depressed."

In his analysis of the deal, which closed Friday, Imam projects Broadwing's annual revenue at $700 million. Corvis reported $448 million in cash in the first quarter.

Perrin, by contrast, is unconvinced. "Corvis is clearly jeopardizing its whole equipment business by becoming a competitor to its customers," he said.

Andy Backman, vice president of investor relations at Corvis, defends the play for Broadwing, which he says is on the upswing. "We're acquiring assets debt free," he said. "You have to understand, we're stripping away $2.5 billion or so in debt. The unit has already gone through a restructuring, and we believe the acquisition will generate positive returns."
Backman also said Broadwing will have its own management team, led by telecom industry veteran Jerry Kent, who will be CEO of the subsidiary.


Another explanation for the Broadcom deal is that Corvis did not want to risk losing its biggest customer to another telecom provider or other rival. In fiscal year 2002 the broadband unit accounted for 44% of Corvis' $20 million in revenue.

In the first quarter, revenues at Corvis' newly acquired broadband division fell 22% to $211 million, compared with the year-ago period. Cincinnati Bell attributed the drop to "customer bankruptcies, exiting lines of business, and weak demand in the carrier and IT hardware markets."

For all of 2002 the unit reported revenue of $1 billion and a net loss of $2.4 billion, compared with Corvis' net loss for the year of $508 million.