Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Precious and Base Metal Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Canuck Dave who wrote (12694)	6/19/2003 12:35:25 AM
From: E. Charters	Respond to of 39344

A good criteria is to multiply the number of grams times the number of shares out, and divide the fourth root of that by the number of times they say "epithermal carbonate replacement zone" and "grade will increase with depth" in news releases... that is taken to the power of the number of politicians on the board of directors, and factored by the number of times the country's has replaced dictators in the past 39 months. This figure is multiplied times the number of holes drilled, and the width of the smallest intersection, which is again divided by the widest intersection. Divide again by the 43-101 geologist age and apply a factor of 90 for silver, 10 for gold, and 5 for diamonds, divide and multiply by the the Dow. This number, if it is more than 40 but less than 500 is totally meaningless. If it is between 1,966,457 and ten trillion and 8, it means that you should have sold the stock short, any other number ending in 3 means that you missed the rise and margins will be well, marginal. EC<:-}