SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: KLP who wrote (2440)6/20/2003 4:08:04 AM
From: LindyBill  Respond to of 793964
 
Reading Scores a Mixed Bag for Students - National Test Shows Lower Grades Improving, High School Seniors in Slump

By Michael A. Fletcher
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, June 20, 2003; Page A12

This is Washington, DCs premier paper. Would you guess from reading this that the test shows:

1) The DC District's schoolchildren rank as the worst readers in the country and only slightly better in some grades than non-English-speaking children in the territories of Guam, the Virgin Islands and American Samoa.

2) The DC District's schoolchildren in all grades are slipping backward as other jurisdictions improve, despite per-pupil spending and teacher salaries that are among the highest in the country.

3) More than two-thirds of the city's fourth-graders and more than half of its eighth-graders had "below basic" reading ability last year, according to NAEP tests. "Below basic" means the children could not demonstrate an understanding of what they read.

4) The District's percentage of "below basic" readers also was 20 percentage points higher than the national average for city students, even though the District's $9,650 per-pupil cost and average teacher salary of $48,651 topped all but a few states, according to the report.

I had to get this information from that "Lousy" Washington Times, which ran their version of this on the front page. Shows you what a "Liberal" slant of the news can do.http://www.washingtontimes.com/national/20030620-120913-1954r.htm


Reading scores for the nation's fourth-graders rose between 1998 and 2002, an improvement that was tempered by a flat performance by eighth-graders and a decline among high school seniors, according to the results of a widely respected national test released yesterday.

The National Assessment of Educational Progress, a test given to representative samples of students in 43 states, found that 31 percent of fourth-graders, 33 percent of eighth-graders and 36 percent of 12th-graders could read at least at the proficient level -- meaning they could handle challenging subject matter.

The results showed that 36 percent of fourth-graders and 25 percent of eighth-graders performed below the basic level, failing to demonstrate even partial mastery of reading. That was an improvement over 1998, when 40 percent of fourth-graders and 27 percent of eighth-graders scored below basic on the exam.

But reading scores were uniformly disappointing among the nation's high school seniors, with 26 percent scoring below basic in 2002, a decline of 2 percentage points from 1998. Also, 36 percent of 12th-graders scored at or above the proficient level, down from 40 percent in 1998.

"There are no scientific answers to why our high school seniors have performed so poorly on this reading assessment, but we're still searching for solutions to these daunting challenges," Education Secretary Roderick R. Paige said in a statement.

Often referred to as the nation's report card, the NAEP test is viewed by many educators as a rigorous and reliable measure of educational achievement. The tests are graded on a 500-point scale, and results are reported in four categories: below basic, basic, proficient and advanced.

Locally, Virginia fourth- and eighth-graders improved on the test over the past four years, with students in both grades exceeding national test averages. Overall, 37 percent of the state's students in both grades scored at or above proficient on the exam. Scores for 12th-graders are offered only on a nationwide basis.

"I think what the Virginia experience shows is that when you have accountability for results and when you make an effort to focus particularly on reading instruction, you get higher achievement, said Mark Christie, president of the state's Board of Education. "You've got a clear correlation [with] the phasing in of the Standards of Learning program, which has brought in accountability and these scores."

Reading scores also improved in Maryland, where 30 percent of fourth-graders and 32 percent of eighth-graders scored at or above proficient. State Department of Education spokesman William Reinhard attributed the increases in fourth-grade scores to a Maryland-wide focus on strengthening early childhood curriculum.

The state has been expanding full-day kindergarten programs, which will be a requirement by the 2006-2007 school year. "We're turning kindergarten from traditionally more of a social experience into an academic one," Reinhard said. "A lot more reading goes on in kindergarten than used to."

In the District, fourth-grade and eighth-grade scores on the exam were flat. Overall, 10 percent of District students in each grade scored at or above proficient.

Nationwide, the test results continued to show significant racial achievement gaps at each grade level. Girls performed better than boys at all grade levels, a gap that widened among high school seniors. Students from lower-income homes lagged behind their more affluent peers. Most troubling, officials said, is that white and Asian American students continued to outscore blacks and Hispanics by wide margins.

Among fourth-graders in the nation's public schools, for example, 39 percent of whites and 36 percent of Asian Americans scored at or above the proficient level. Only 12 percent of blacks and 14 percent of Hispanics reached the same threshold.

Education Undersecretary Eugene W. Hickok said the achievement gaps will close only after school systems are confronted with this type of data on a continuing basis.
washingtonpost.com



To: KLP who wrote (2440)6/20/2003 12:08:48 PM
From: American Spirit  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793964
 
The situation in Iraq is FUBAR now. We need Peacekeepers but cant get them. Instead we're using our troops as cops and as targets. That's how we root out shooters, by using our troops as bait. Like Vietnam Redux.

The American-haters would not likely attack peacekeepers. Bush also should have had a popular government leader to install in Iraq ASAP. SO far the only guy they have is Cheney's boy who everyone knows it a corrupt puppet type.
As for elections, forgettaboutit. The Shiites would win and kick the Bushies out. Some victory huh? Easy to invade, impossible to settle.

Is there any way out of this? See the power of the UN? The Third World respects the UN. It's not a perfect body by any means, but at least it's considered neutral and therefore largely cooperated with. As for Bushies, you either love em or hate em, and over in Iraq there are way too many with guns who hate us. I feel really sorry for our troops over there. And boy dod they wish they could come home.