Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stop the War! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jttmab who wrote (18579)	6/20/2003 4:17:34 PM
From: Lazarus_Long	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21614

You seriously underestimate your curiosity. There were 6 questions. It seems reasonable to expect that a form of common law marriage existed prior to the religous ceremony. But what difference does that make in any event? To me? None. But then I consider marriage to be a civil contract. If you're religious, your mileage may vary. . It doesn't say any thing one way or another about sexual orientation. Children? Pretty hard to have biological children result from a same-sex union. So far, anyway. Then there's "a" Marriage....1 a : the state of being married. Don't you just love dictionaries. How much clearer can you get? Don't knock dicionaries. Better than not having them. You going to ask what is between Bret or Justine's legs? How about if Bret went through a sex change operation...is that a heterosexual or homosexual marriage? If Bret went through a sex change operation and got married to John in a mainstream church is that good enough for you? How many angels can dance on the head of a pin?