Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (102200)	6/20/2003 6:04:55 PM
From: Noel de Leon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

"It sounds to me like the Noel is credulously reading Palestinian sources, which will say anything." Here is the source since you didn't bother to read it when I first posted it. indexonline.org Here is another. "US weapons stance 'hypocritical' From correspondents in New York THE US administration cited Iraq's alleged stocks of weapons of mass destruction in its decision to invade. President George W Bush now says Syria, too, owns an arsenal of chemical weapons. But the list of countries with likely chemical, biological or nuclear weapons programs is not confined to nations the US may consider hostile. It also includes US allies like Israel, Egypt, Pakistan, India and Taiwan. "The allegation is, we use weapons of mass destruction as an excuse when we have it out for other countries," said Jon Wolfsthal, deputy director of the Non-Proliferation Project at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. "We tend to look the other way when it suits our interest. That decision has come back to haunt us." Israel's nuclear weapons program was thought to include about 200 warheads deployed on ballistic missiles and aircraft, Wolfsthal said. In 2000, Israel had placed nuclear-tipped missiles on three submarines, pushing its capabilities beyond those of declared nuclear states India and Pakistan, and possibly even China, Wolfsthal said. In a strategy reminiscent of Iraq and Afghanistan, Israel is believed to store nuclear missiles on mobile launchers in caves, according to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. Israel is also believed to stock chemical and biological weapons, according to the Carnegie Endowment and the Monterey Institute of International Studies, which track such issues. Israeli officials do not comment on the country's nuclear weapons potential. Egypt, another leading US ally, is believed to harbour chemical weapons - including deadly sarin and VX agents - along with, perhaps, an offensive bio-weapons capability, according to the Monterey Institute. India and Pakistan have publicly tested nuclear weapons. They also are suspected to be engaged in chemical and biological weapons research, according to Carnegie and Monterey. Taiwan, another staunch US ally, probably maintains a chemical weapons program and may have a biological research program, according to Monterey. Saudi Arabia had bought nuclear-capable intermediate-range missiles from China, though the Saudis were not believed to have nuclear warheads to put in them, Wolfsthal said. He said the Bush administration would be shortsighted to single out Syria, North Korea, Iran and Iraq, because ignoring proliferation among allies like Israel and Pakistan had allowed the technology to spread further. Israel is known to have aided South Africa's now-defunct nuclear program. Pakistan is believed to have cooperated with similar programs in North Korea and Iran. Other countries with current chemical and biological weapons stocks or research programs include Russia, China, Libya and Sudan, according to the Carnegie Endowment. The United States and Britain, both among the world's seven declared nuclear powers, have developed their own chemical and biological weapons in the past. Britain has destroyed all such stocks, and the United States is still eliminating the last vestiges of its chemical weapons, according to Amy Smithson, a chemical and biological weapons researcher with the Henry L. Stimson Centre, a national security think tank in Washington. The United States still develops small amounts of weapons-grade chemical and biological toxins in order to defend against them, Smithson says. themercury.news.com.au