Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : The Boxing Ring Revived -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tom Clarke who wrote (6499)	6/21/2003 7:56:14 AM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7720

Sounds like another example of senile judges and why the law is turning into a laughingstock. When people do things that seem utterly ridiculous to me, I try to imagine some other reasonable viewpoint from which they may be looking at the issue. I woke up this morning wondering if, perhaps, the judges in question were just younger than I. Spike was a common nickname when I was a kid. I vaguely remember a dog named Spike, a bulldog, I think, in a comic strip. And then there was Spike Jones, the entertainer. So it's hard for me to imagine that Spike Lee has any more ownership of "Spike" than George Bush has of "George." But you don't hear the name as often nowadays. The only other Spike I can think of in today's popular culture is the one on Buffy. So perhaps if one is young enough, one might reasonably see Spike Lee as the model for all Spikes. Nah... It's ridiculous, indeed.