Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (417525)	6/22/2003 3:33:11 PM
From: American Spirit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Bushie censorship of EPA report on global warming is scandalous. In the pockets of Big Oil and other polluters, the Bushie will absolutely not tell us the truth about the long-term damage caused by pollution. Think about this, if we took the money we just spent on Iraq, we could put together a clean fuels program which could take us OFF Arab oil completely within ten or so years. But that is the LAST thing Bushies want. Their bread is buttered with Arab oil and always has been.

To: tejek who wrote (417525)	6/22/2003 3:33:38 PM
From: Thomas A Watson	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 769670

LOL, what an article of stupidity science. The simple question is this. Is there any real change in the climate? No real proof exists that the increase in CO2 and other greenhouse gases have materially impacted the climate. No computers models can demonstrate the cause and and effect. The historical record contains too little data to make a certain conclusion one way or the other. But what is really idiotic about the whole debate is that in the context of planet earth, no matter what America does to reduce or not green house gas emissions, the world with increase that output of those gases by 10 times or more in the future. America's contribution to the total green house gas emissions decreases dramatically in the future. Does anyone really think less than a 1% change in the rate of increase will make any difference??? Any fool who makes the arguments made in that article have simply demonstrated they are total science ignoramuses. We already knew you were, but thanks for letting us know there are others out there writing dumb dumb stuff.