SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: KLP who wrote (102486)6/23/2003 7:00:49 PM
From: marcos  Respond to of 281500
 
' Senators Predict 5-Year Presence in Iraq

By Will Dunham

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. senators said on Monday American troops could remain in Iraq (news - web sites) for at least five years, and U.S. officials said there was no indication toppled Iraqi President Saddam Hussein (news - web sites) or his sons were killed in an attack on suspected "regime figures" in western Iraq.

The lawmakers, members of the influential
Senate Foreign Relations Committee on a
bipartisan fact-finding visit to Iraq, urged
President Bush (news - web sites) to be more
forthcoming* about the breadth of the U.S.
commitment and the cost of rebuilding Iraq.

"I think we're going to be here in a big way with
forces and economic input for a minimum of
three to five years," Sen. Joseph Biden (news,
bio, voting record), the committee's ranking
Democrat, told reporters in Baghdad.

"There now needs to be real truth-telling by the
president and by each of us," added Sen.
Richard Lugar (news, bio, voting record) of
Indiana, the committee's chairman.

Lugar and fellow panel Republican Sen. Chuck
Hagel (news, bio, voting record) of Nebraska
agreed that five years was a realistic figure.

"The president's instructions are that we will
stay as long as necessary but not a day longer.
I think we are still in the very early stages of the
post-major-combat era," White House
spokesman Ari Fleischer (news - web sites)
told reporters.

Fleischer said it was an "open question" as to
how long it would take to establish security and
stability in Iraq, beginning with the country's
ability to self-govern.

Bush has stated his opposition to U.S.
participation in "nation-building," and top
administration officials scoffed at prewar predictions by a top Army general
that hundreds of thousands of U.S. troops would be needed to occupy
postwar Iraq. .... '

story.news.yahoo.com

* - 'more forthcoming', lol

KLP, it is not particularly helpful to post the header of this thread to me, i have seen it .... likely many here have not read the magazine 'Foreign Affairs', personally i do not even know where to buy it, doesn't matter though, 'other sources' are specifically permitted, and i should think they could maybe perhaps include personal experience, and shall operate on that assumption until someone with authority and/or intelligence comes along and says otherwise .... meantime you'll gain nothing grinding on like this, hopefully you'll realise that

As for caring, there are six billions on this planet, it is a long queue of folks to care about, feel free to join at the end



To: KLP who wrote (102486)6/23/2003 11:12:31 PM
From: Win Smith  Respond to of 281500
 
It's nice that FL has those guidelines. I'm quite aware of how arbitrarily they have been enforced, thank you. "Useful idiot" and "hate America" blather doesn't count as insulting, as near as I can tell. Stuff like that merely "polite discussion" in the conservative realm of things. Or maybe it's the "truth", in the same conservative sense that Rummy was telling the "truth" about WMDs.