SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Israel to U.S. : Now Deal with Syria and Iran -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Emile Vidrine who wrote (1096)6/24/2003 12:21:02 PM
From: Emile Vidrine  Respond to of 22250
 
TALIBAN JEWS CAN'T BE REASONED WITH

<<<< Former Sefaradi chief rabbi Rabbi Mordechai
Eliyahu said: “No one in the world, from
drawers of water and hewers of stone to prime
ministers, has the right to give up one grain
of the land of Israel. The Holy One, blessed be
He, gave us the land of Israel. There is
holiness in every single grain.”

He also said that if a Jew eats the fruit of a
tree that a gentile has planted and cultivated
in the land of Israel, he is obligated to tithe
the fruit. Furthermore, he said, “The
houses could today be the private property of
an individual Gentile, but when the Messiah
comes we will ask the Gentile to pay
rent.” >>>

Try negotiating with these sick Judeofascists and see how far you get.

Folks, the harsh reality is that Israel has become a nightmare, a hot bed for messianic doomsday fanaticis and a great liability to the people of America. The irony of all ironies was that Israel or Zionism initially was a political movement. In fact, according to historians:" It is interesting that Herzl’s primary opposition came from many western rabbis and some of the most wealthy and influential Jewish leaders who were absolutely opposed to the whole idea of Zionism. They called it treasonable. They said Judaism was a religious order, not a political movement. They even agreed that it was fine to have agricultural settlements in Palestine, but it was subversive to the Jewish image to identify the people with a political loyalty to Zion that would be considered a higher allegiance than that which they owed to the nation in which they held citizenship. This hostility toward Zionism still persists in some Jewish circles even today."

What's ironic is that while Zionism started out a political movement, the Rabbi's jumped on this bandwagon and now have hijacked the political movement and today a large segment of the population are motivated by a theological zeal than just nationalism. The settlers and Orthodox Jews are the most extreme but the reality is, a fair number of Jews and ALL of Christian Zionists base their belief in Zion [Israel] on a false and anti-Christian interpretation of Old Testamtne prophecies which have already been fulfilled by Jesus.

This was almost predictable, looking back. I guess hindsight being 20/20 it appears that way now but in this case, the roots of fanatacism were sown years ago. I believe not by the first Jewish settler but by the first CHRISTIAN ZIONIST who ever supported Israel. Christian has a history of having too many charlatans and too many soothsayers. You knew these modern day sham artists will find a way to profit from this scam..ie. that the creation of Israel is somehow a prophetic event straight from the bible. Once Hal Lindsey saw the power of this sham in generating money for his coffer, more outlandish books were soon to follow after the first successful book back in 1974. In that book, the world was to end in 1980. His second book predicted the end of times in 1991. When the first Gulf War happened, Lindsey said doomsday is at hand. Of course, we had to learn that doomsday was now 2000 in a new book. So this scam continues to this day, Christan Zionist led to believe Israel, and not the Christian Church, is somehow a timeclock for the end of times. These antichrist Zionists simply replaced the Church with modern Talmudic Judaism.

It would be funny if not that people on both sides of this conflict are getting killed on account of this madness. Now you have nuts in Congress, like Tom Delay, and even Bush himself view this conflict from the warped perspective of fanatic and heretical Christian zionisism.



To: Emile Vidrine who wrote (1096)6/24/2003 5:42:00 PM
From: Ed Huang  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 22250
 
Looks like there's an interesting contradiction point about the Rabbis’ views here. From the link below,

nkusa.org

we can see a sign by the NY Rabbis that read: “Authentic Rabbis have always opposed Zionism and the State of Israel”. But on the other reports, the Rabbis’ view show the opposite, who seem to hold a more hard line than Sharon in expanding Israel's territory.

As to tell which side is the authentic Rabbis, can you or any one in this thread to explain the issue? Thanks.