SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Investment Chat Board Lawsuits -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Patricia who wrote (4757)6/24/2003 1:21:25 PM
From: Stockbull  Respond to of 12465
 
Good info Patricia!!!!But IMHO some have closed minds on the Issue...



To: Patricia who wrote (4757)6/24/2003 1:51:23 PM
From: Anthony@Pacific  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 12465
 


a) is informational. An informational photo is one used to elaborate or illustrate a story or article.

b) doesn’t invade the person’s privacy. An example of invading a person’s privacy would be using a hidden camera or using a photo that depicts a very personal or potentially embarrassing activity.

c) is not defamatory. If your photo creates a false impression that injures someone’s reputation, you could be liable for defamation or libel.



That doesnt apply to someone who is trying to profit by selling those pictures...why do you think those models get all that money and Playboy has contracts and CBS goes nuts if someone resembles one of their TV personalities..yadda yadd yadda



To: Patricia who wrote (4757)6/24/2003 2:55:14 PM
From: Mahatmabenfoo  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 12465
 
Patricia quoted:
-- There are also some exceptions for public figures and people who have become the subject of a public controversy.

BINGO!

sound like anyone we know?

- Charles