Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Brokerage-Chat Site Securities Fraud: A Lawsuit -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: CountofMoneyCristo who wrote (1237)	6/24/2003 6:32:14 PM
From: CountofMoneyCristo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3143

Answer, [if you're defendant Christopher Rea, a/k/a Merlin]: “Trading Places never had any advisory function whatsoever.” - Supplemental Declaration of Christopher Rea Supporting Motion to Quash or Dismiss on Forum non Conveniens Grounds, February 13, 2003, p.2, 4. “I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the States of California and Illinois that the foregoing is true and correct.” DATED: February 13, 2003 [Signature of Christopher Rea] - - Supplemental Rea Declaration, p.4, 1. “Contrary to Plaintiff’s Opposition, Trading Places was not a ‘day trading advisory site.’ Also, contrary to Plaintiff’s Opposition, Plaintiff was not ‘given trading recommendations on securities transactions’ at that site.” - Reply Memorandum Supporting Christopher Rea’s Motion to Quash and Trading Places, Inc.’s Motion to Quash or Dismiss on Forum non Conveniens Grounds, February 13, 2003, p.2, 2, “FACTS”. “In fact, Trading Places had no advisory function whatsoever.” - Rea Reply, p.2, Footnote 1, “FACTS”. Gotta hand it to him, he is not shy, either.