SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (102876)6/25/2003 5:12:32 PM
From: Ilaine  Respond to of 281500
 
>>the Romans deported most of the inhabitants of Judea<<

Not so. The Romans deported pretty much all of the Jewish residents of Jerusalem, and killed or enslaved the rebellious Jews, it's true. But not all Jews took part in the revolt, and these were not deported.

The concept of "country" is rather slippery, don't you think? Many present-day "countries" used to be a lot of unaffiliated city-states and principalities. For example, Germans did not think of themselves as "German" until the late 19th century, but as Prussians or Swabians and so forth.

In Palestine, there was a lot of "meet the new boss, same as the old boss" but the inhabitants were there.

When was the last time there was a "country" of Israel, prior to 1948?

And what, pray tell, does this have to do with anything, other than trying to argue that the Palestinians have no claim to the land?



To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (102876)6/25/2003 5:14:26 PM
From: carranza2  Respond to of 281500
 
I'm trying to discern a reason why the Jews' ancient history has any relevance to present (or even historical) foreign affairs. Marginally topical, in my view.

The discussion will lead ineluctably to the history of the Palestinian/Israeli conflict, which is OT here.

Message 16607278