SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : SARS - what next? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Henry Niman who wrote (601)6/25/2003 10:50:12 PM
From: Henry Niman  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1070
 
>>because their polymerase gene does have a proof reading function<<

The post should read the polymerase doe NOT have a proof reading function (mine does work well either).



To: Henry Niman who wrote (601)6/26/2003 8:14:57 AM
From: Maurice Winn  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1070
 
Henry, I've been misinformed in that case. A month or two ago I saw photos of the various bugs and was surprised how big the sars bug was. The colds were little by comparison; little being about 1/10th the diameter = minuscule in volume and 1/100th the surface area. Maybe the photos were fakes.

I suppose I should read something about how these bugs work rather than making it up myself using civil engineering and oil industry principles with telecommunications context.

But using those principles for a moment, if colds and other corona viruses are so smart alecky and can mutate at the drop of a hat, how come we only get one cold a year instead of hundreds? They certainly have a monster breeding pool and compared with sars have all the time in the world and all the people in the world in which to mutate by the petatrillion.

There's a logic link missing in there and when I notice logic links missing, it's usually for a good reason to do with the information being incomplete or plain wrong.

One doesn't need to be expert in a field to notice inconsistencies. How come we only get one or two colds a year if they are so mutatable?

Thanks for the detailed explanation of replication.

Mqurice