Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LindyBill who wrote (103114)	6/27/2003 1:36:00 AM
From: Ilaine	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

My own experience of Canada was that it was far, far cleaner than the US. Mexico, well, that varies from place to place. Some very beautiful parts of Mexico. I would have to say that the most beautiful places I have ever seen in my entire life are in Mexico. Tulum in particular. I was just contemplating the fact that you can buy pretty much any prescription drug you want in Mexico without going to a doctor, just the pharmacy. Hard to contemplate a libertarian attacking someone in favor of tariffs, but hey, that's what makes politics.

To: LindyBill who wrote (103114)	6/27/2003 2:56:35 AM
From: marcos	Respond to of 281500

But it's not 'bad manners' to destroy all international cooperation in your eagerness to roll tanks over another people's country in the fashion and on the day of your own unilateral choosing, eh ... if i catch your drift ... well perhaps we disagree on points of etiquette then, we could consult an authority on them if you feel it important .... there's a guy named Blix out of work now i hear, ran out of WMDs, whatever that is, maybe he can help ..... you know though, now that you bring up manners and all, this thing of making gratuitous insults in place of responding to argument, like you do here with the 'cesspool' crack, that happens to contravene a breach of the peace under the manners code i scanned one time, and the statute could be argued to make a degree of sense, as what good would it do if we were talking the rolling of tanks and the barking of orders and all of a sudden i interjected that i had seen some of the streets of the rollers and the barkers and they weren't all verdant upscale boulevards in Beverly Hills either, eh ... so i do see your point yes, and raise you Watts If an occasional mild exaggeration for emphasis in the cause of refraining from boring the respondent while getting across the absurdity of the whole neocon our way or the highway yer with us or agin us trip is feeling a bit much for you, perhaps you could sit a little further back from the screen until you get a better administration? .... hope that helps ... cheers