SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Wharf Rat who wrote (21144)6/27/2003 10:32:31 AM
From: T L Comiskey  Respond to of 89467
 
U.S. Soldier Dies in Ambush in Iraq
By JIM KRANE


BAGHDAD, Iraq (AP) - Ambushers killed a U.S. soldier in southern Iraq and U.S. troops arrested three Iraqis Friday in connection with the disappearance of two U.S. servicemen north of Baghdad.

At least three U.S. military personnel have been killed in Iraq since Thursday, two of them in ambushes against U.S.-led occupation forces.

Also Friday, a gunman shot a U.S. soldier shopping for video compact discs on a sidewalk in northwest Baghdad, witnesses said. Ammar Saad, a 44-year-old vendor, said the soldier was shot in the neck at close range and appeared to have been killed. U.S. military spokesmen in Baghdad said they had heard of the incident but were unable to confirm it.

Saad and another witness, 20-year-old porter Jassem Obeid, said the assailant escaped into crowds at a nearby market.


A U.S. Army Military Police soldier was killed while investigating a car theft Thursday in Najaf, 160 kilometers (100 miles) southwest of Baghdad, said Army Sgt. Patrick Compton, a U.S. military spokesman in Baghdad. And a U.S. Navy sailor died in a non-combat incident in southern Iraq Thursday.


The MP, who was attached to the 1st Marine Expeditionary Force, died before medics arrived on the scene. The sailor who died was also attached to the 1st MEF, Compton said.


The names of the dead service members were withheld pending notification of relatives.


Also Friday, three suspects detained in connection with the disappearance of two American soldiers were being interrogated, Compton said.


Intense ground and aerial searches have so far failed to find the soldiers or their Humvee, and the U.S. military suspects the missing vehicle and soldiers' uniforms could be used by enemy forces in a fresh attack, Compton said.


``They're (U.S. soldiers) keeping extra watch out for that vehicle and will approach it as a hostile vehicle,'' Compton said. ``They don't know what they will encounter when they get up to it.''


The missing pair were guarding the perimeter of a rocket demolition site near the town of Balad, 40 kilometers (25 miles) north of Baghdad, when they failed to answer a radio call and became the subject of a manhunt Wednesday night, Compton said.


Compton said he was unsure whether the soldiers are still alive.


``We don't know if they were abducted or they were just killed,'' he said.


Just northwest of Baghdad Friday morning, a U.S. Army truck struck an explosive device on a dirt road. A U.S. soldier and an eyewitness said wounded Americans were evacuated by helicopter.


The U.S. soldier, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said the Americans were driving to Baghdad to make telephone calls to their families when the explosion occurred.


Between Wednesday and Thursday, assailants blew up a U.S. military vehicle with a roadside bomb, dropped grenades from an overpass, destroyed a civilian SUV traveling with U.S. troops, demolished an oil pipeline and fired an rocket-propelled grenade at a U.S. Army truck, wounding two soldiers.


Hostile fire also killed one U.S. special operations soldier and wounded eight others on Thursday, the military said, without providing details.


Until recently, most violence against U.S.-led occupying forces in Iraq occurred in the Sunni Muslim-dominated belt north and west of Baghdad, where Saddam Hussein enjoyed a degree of support. In the past few days, attacks have spread to the Shiite majority south.


Late Thursday, a British plane dropped leaflets on the southern town of Majar al-Kabir, where six British soldiers and at least five Iraqi civilians were killed in violent clashes on Tuesday.


The leaflets stated that the U.S.-led coalition forces regret the loss of life among Iraqi civilians, and added that coalition forces were not behind the incident.


``We will not return to punish anyone since these are the methods of Saddam's regime. We will return to set up good relations with you because of our concern about a secure Iraq,'' the three-paragraph statement read. ``Don't let rumors ruin our good relations.''


The leaflets added that British forces - who have not been seen in the volatile town since Tuesday's melee - would return to Majar al-Kabir, 290 kilometers (180 miles) southeast of Baghdad, to repair the damage done during Saddam's rule. It didn't specify when the British plan to return.


Officials played down the violence, but the surge in attacks is causing concern that the U.S.-led occupation of Iraq could be turning into a guerrilla war.


A military spokesman, Maj. William Thurmond, said the spate of ambushes could be a response to recent U.S. raids on Baath Party strongholds.


``There have been more attacks recently, but it's probably premature to say this is part of a pattern,'' Thurmond said. ``We've kicked open the nests of some of these bad guys.''


The Arab satellite station Al-Jazeera, however, aired statements Thursday from two previously unknown groups urging assaults on U.S.-led forces in Iraq.


One, by a group calling itself the Mujahedeen of the Victorious Sect, claimed responsibility for recent attacks and promised more. The other, by the Popular Resistance for the Liberation of Iraq, called for ``revenge'' against America.


Al-Jazeera said it could not verify the statements.


Two U.S. officials familiar with intelligence information said they had not previously heard of the groups issuing the statements and had no way to know whether they were credible.


Tensions in the Iraqi capital have been exacerbated by electricity outages that have worsened over the past week. Some areas of Baghdad have gone without power for three or more days at a time.


U.S. officials acknowledge that Baghdad's electricity supply is decreasing - after improving for a time after the war. They blame incessant blackouts on sabotage at power stations.


The lack of electricity - which also prevents drinking water from being pumped - has fueled frustrations and anti-U.S. sentiment.


Residents in Baghdad and across Iraq still suffer from a withering crime wave, with carjackings, muggings and shootings common.


Andrew Bearpark, director of operations for the occupying administration, told reporters Friday that the outages were due to a ``mixture of technical problems and criminal sabotage.''


He added that part of the problem is that people are buying more appliances and using more electricity - and vowed that reconstruction will go on.


``We will succeed, we will rebuild,'' he said.


AP writers Sameer N. Yacoub, Bassem Mroue and Nadia Abou el-Magd contributed to this report.


(jk/sg)



To: Wharf Rat who wrote (21144)6/27/2003 11:16:54 AM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
Bush never made serious postwar plans

____________________________________________

Litany of problems in Iraq is the result.

By Trudy Rubin
Columnist
The Philadelphia Inquirer
Posted on Thu, Jun. 26, 2003
philly.com

BAGHDAD - Whoever was responsible at top levels in the Pentagon for postwar planning should be fired.

But then no one would be fired. Three weeks in Iraq makes very clear that no one in the Bush administration made serious postwar plans before the start of the Iraq war.

That lack of foresight is largely responsible for the huge occupation problems the Bush team now faces - as Iraqi anger mounts over lack of security, electricity, water, sewage and jobs. Unless the Bush administration invests many more resources into its Iraq venture, soon, it could lose the peace.

Why was the Pentagon so unprepared for the Day After? Because top officials convinced themselves that the aftermath would be easy - and cost-free.

Back in November, Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz told me he believed that the London-based Iraqi opposition (headed by Ahmad Chalabi) would return to Baghdad and assume the reins of power, just as Gen. Charles DeGaulle and the Free French returned triumphantly to postwar France.

Top White House and Pentagon officials refused to listen to warnings that Chalabi and other Iraqi exiles did not command sufficient support inside Iraq. Nor did they heed warnings that Saddam's highly centralized government structure would collapse once he was ousted.

"The expectations at the Pentagon were that [government] ministries would emerge unscathed" and take over the running of the country, one senior U.S. official told me when I was in Baghdad. No one foresaw the virtual collapse of many ministries, nor their physical destruction by looters.

"We failed in our duty on the looting," the official continued, a reference to the fact that the military failed to secure ministries, key infrastructure and suspected weapons sites. "I didn't think [the administration] would let it get so out of hand."

The civilian team that was sent by the Pentagon to oversee Iraq was organized only a few weeks before the war, and headed by an ex-general, Jay Garner, who wasn't up to the job. Garner's team lacked "intelligence (information) and had zero organization," an occupation source told me.

Garner planned to be running Iraq for only about three months so his team was unprepared for the much longer occupation that the administration now wants. There was little interchange between people "who knew something about Iraq and the people who were doing Iraq," one U.S. official told me.

Worst of all, the Pentagon provided no communications system for the civilian occupation team - even though U.S. bombs had destroyed Baghdad's phone network. The civilians tasked with running the country couldn't even talk to each other until the end of May, let alone to the Iraqi ministries they were supposedly running. Only now are they getting a limited cell-phone network.

Why the delay? In part, due to political machinations back in Washington over the phone contract. Guess who got the $45 million no-bid deal? MCI/WorldCom, the company that bilked its shareholders out of $11 billion and has very little experience in building wireless networks.

What does this tell you about how serious the Pentagon is about rebuilding Iraq?

Things have improved somewhat since the White House replaced Garner with former diplomat L. Paul Bremer 3d, a man capable of making hard decisions. But most of the experienced officials on his team are already leaving, their three-month contracts expiring. Bremer can't succeed unless the Bush administration comes up with a coherent strategy for postwar Iraq.

No wonder a very senior British official in Baghdad told the Daily Telegraph last week that the American-led reconstruction effort in Iraq was "in chaos" and suffering from "a complete absence of strategic direction."

Perhaps the Pentagon is still expecting a De Gaulle, but there is none, so the Bush team better come up with another plan.

First off, the White House needs to clarify its Iraq aims. U.S. officials won't permit early Iraq elections because they now fear that fundamentalists or authoritarians might win an early ballot. So they plan a lengthy occupation. But so far they refuse to take on the financial burden that is required of an occupying power.

Contrary to Pentagon dreams, big Iraqi oil income is months or years down the line, and won't pay for reconstruction that is needed now. If Iraq's jobless aren't put back to work soon, the number of attacks on U.S. soldiers will mount.

Iraq needs a massive public works project. Yet administration officials say they have no plans to spend more than the $2.5 billion already allotted for occupation this year. Either the occupying power should be ready to pay the freight, or it should get out of Iraq.

The time for self-delusion is past.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Contact columnist Trudy Rubin at 215-854-5823 or trubin@phillynews.com.