SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: tonka552000 who wrote (21151)6/29/2003 8:55:16 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 89467
 
SPECIAL REPORT: WILL WEB SERVICES CLICK?

BusinessWeek Online

JUNE 24, 2003

businessweek.com

Slowly Weaving Web Services Together

Instead of exploding, the movement to help disparate computer systems easily communicate is gaining in fits and starts. Still, it'll likely have a powerful impact.
______________________________________________

In October of 2000, Microsoft (MSFT ) ramped up the buzz machine to sell its latest big initiative. Dubbed .Net (pronounced dot-Net), the project presented a sweeping vision of a new, interconnected world. The software king foresaw a day when consumers and businesses would connect to the Internet anywhere, anytime, via any number of devices -- PCs, cell phones, even refrigerators -- to make life easier. Say you were late for a meeting. If you were a .Netizen, the system could detect from your cell-phone location that you had been delayed, send an e-mail to the waiting parties -- and reschedule subsequent meetings that day.

Microsoft assumed businesses could also use .Net to let disparate software systems carry on dialogues without human interaction, cutting a cost layer and boosting efficiency. Need to find a maker of Widget X and get a bid? In a .Net world, computers could do it with no phone calls or e-mail exchanged, all on infrastructure provided, of course, by Microsoft -- which might ease the transition by providing all this via subscription service rather than by requiring customers to buy their own hardware and software.

Left unsaid was another reason for .Net: A technology with similar possibilities -- Sun Microsystems' (SUNW ) Java platform -- was also being used to build the type of framework for distributed computing that Microsoft proposed. Sun and its allies rushed to stitch together a competing offering, and the battle was joined.

STILL UNREALIZED. Since all of these new services would be built on the same underlying technology that powers the Internet, the category was labeled "Web services." With dot-com mania still in full swing, the grand vision was easy to accept. Data would flow like water from one program to another. Bits and bytes would be wrapped in a format that would be both easy to understand and ridiculously simple to integrate across all manner of computer systems.

Fast-forward to the summer of 2003, and Web services remains a buzzword, but hardly of the stature Bill Gates implied when he called .Net possibly a "bet the company" initiative. According to a report issued in June by consultancy and full-time Colossus of Redmond watcher Directions on Microsoft: "Three years later, most of the hopes behind the .NET initiative have not been realized."

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What's a Web Service?

Good question, and the answer isn't simple. Here's a definition from the online tech dictionary, Webopedia.com:

"The term describes a standardized way of integrating Web-based applications using the XML, SOAP, WSDL, and UDDI open standards over an Internet protocol backbone. XML is used to tag the data, SOAP is used to transfer the data, WSDL is used for describing the services available, and UDDI is used for listing what services are available.

Used primarily as a means for businesses to communicate with each other and with clients, Web services allow organizations to communicate data without intimate knowledge of each other's IT systems behind the firewall."
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The intelligent software that was supposed to weave all types of devices into the fabric of human life hasn't taken hold. Fear of Microsoft has scuttled most of the giant's plans to host customers' critical data. True, businesses are starting to adopt the Web-services model for linking their internal systems and talking to customers. Yet even in that respect, this approach is proving to be more evolutionary than revolutionary. In fact, Web services has become mostly about making software integration easier, faster, and cheaper. That alleviates a pain point for many companies, but it's hardly the dawn of a new era.

NEW CONVERTS. And yet, the vision put forth by Gates and others has shifted the computing landscape in crucial ways. Tech consultancy International Data Corp. estimates that North American companies implemented 3,300 Web-services projects in 2002. Spending on related professional services should break the $1 billion level in 2003, increasing 146% next year to $2.7 billion. ZapThink, a Waltham (Mass.) consultancy that tracks the Web-services market, estimates that spending on the technology was $1.8 billion in 2002 and should exceed $5 billion next year. Those estimates are imprecise, given the blurry definition of Web services (see right).

Still, tech consultancy Accenture (ACN ) estimates that 25% of the customers of its financial-services unit want some type of Web-services component built into what they're buying. IBM (IBM ) now employs more than 1,000 people to work on technologies associated with Web services. And BEA Systems (BEAS ), a server software company that's perhaps more closely tied to Web services than any other outfit, posted revenues of $934 million in 2002.

The newly converted include Yellow Corp. (YELL ) subsidiary Yellow Transportation, the Overland Park (Kan.) trucking company that booked $2.5 billion in 2002 revenues. Yellow has 400,000 customers that often want shipping-rate quotes on the fly. "We know our customers like to have access to their data via our systems, says Rich Hardt, vice-president for technology services at Yellow. "Our objective was to get ahead of them."

THE XML LINK. To accomplish that in fourth-quarter 2001, Hardt built a Web-services function that would let his customers reach into Yellow's internal systems and pull out rates on schedules the two parties had already negotiated. Yellow uses a so-called Web application server -- available from IBM, Oracle (ORCL ), BEA, Microsoft, and others -- to translate information from its internal systems into an XML (extensible markup language) format.

In fact, the key piece of Web services is XML, a format for transmitting data that any Internet-connected device can read. Thus, a customer using XML can build a tailored template to display rate quotes on its own Web site using data supplied by Yellow. Or it can build an engine that lets it compare quotes from Yellow and other carriers. A customer that wants to get really radical can let its employees receive Yellow shipment-tracking information on their Nextel (NXTL ) cell phones, which can also understand and display XML in a stripped-down interface.

"It's almost treating our customers no differently than we would treat an employee," says Hardt. As Yellow's system illustrates, a browser isn't needed to talk via the Web. "All of a sudden, when I have a common language, it's easy to build applications that can communicate," says Steve van Roekel, Microsoft's director of platform computing.

[Page 2 of 2]

IT'S WHAT THEY WANT. Of course, this sounds pretty familiar to anyone who has watched software companies promise superior integration -- and then fail to deliver. An entire subindustry of companies, called enterprise application integrators, has grown up around this concept, and they've failed time and again to establish common standards. Critics have hammered Microsoft in particular in the past for refusing to help establish standards. Thus, Web services "is really one of the few times where you're seeing the same story from Microsoft, BEA, Sun, and IBM in terms of interoperability," says Jim Adamczyk, chief technology officer of the financial services group at Accenture.

That's because customers are demanding it, says Bob Sutor, IBM's director of WebSphere infrastructure software. And in a weak tech market their suppliers listen. "They want to conduct a transaction," says Sutor. "They don't want to spend two weeks figuring out how you built your system and I built mine." Customers also are tired of getting stuck with a software company or consultant they no longer trust. For that reason, they love Web services because it means they can keep whatever programs they're using and just worry about translating info into XML to talk to other systems.

That, in turn, could mean less need to buy new software or even to upgrade old software that works fine but isn't as compatible with newer versions. "It will ultimately move software to more of a commodity business," says Steve Baloff, general partner at venture-capital firm Advanced Technology Ventures.

UNAPPROVED ACCESS. The new world of Web services has its dark sides, of course. It leaves company networks more porous. As larger numbers of outsiders log into key systems, sifting out friends and foes becomes a more difficult task. For example, a hospital may want to let doctors view a patient's records while at the same time letting admitting staff view insurance information and financial staff view the account's status. With Web services, all that information often exists in the same XML feed. But it's important to program in limitations so that only the right people can see the right things.

At the moment, "this doesn't work very well," says Donald Flinn, a Web services security expert and managing partner at security consultancy Flint Security. "You might have a number of intermediates in the way who you don't want to see what's going on," he adds.

Yet even in a sensitive field such as health care, the lure of Web services seems strong. Health insurance giant Cigna (CI ) has created novel ways to mix and match data that it believes helps patients and doctors. Its Web-services effort, called MyCigna.com, offers nifty tools such as financial-planning modeling. Visitors can track claims, order medications, or change doctors on the site. The portal also offers side-by-side comparisons of drugs by cost and side effects, as well as comparisons of hospitals by cost and success rates of certain surgeries.

NO SCHOOL, NO A/C. A patient can also get a list of questions to ask a doctor about a drug or can enter symptoms into the system to get lists and descriptions of the ailment he or she might have -- along with a hot-line phone number to ask more about it. To create all this, Cigna pulls together, on the fly, information from its various computer systems using Web services. "We built MyCigna.com so the participants can get the most out of their benefits," says Chief Information Officer Andrea Anania. "This tool allows them to manage their benefits any time, any place, in a very personalized way."

That's just the beginning. Milwaukee-based Johnson Controls (JCI ) has just announced a new Web-services initiative that uses Microsoft's .Net to integrate systems that haven't been tied together before. Johnson, which makes climate-control systems, can now link a school's calendar to its climate-control system so that school holidays can be programmed from any Web-enabled device.

Another key use: In isolation rooms in the critical-care wings of hospitals, the system can integrate humidity, temperature, and other climate data on the same screen with patient admission and status data -- and a video feed. This gives doctors all they need to know about the physical conditions inside any number of rooms without having to physical walk into each one. It saves time and enhances efficiency. Patient status and climate data now reside in systems that often aren't even programmed in the same software language. But a Web-services front end lets them speak fluently. "That's something they never could have done before," says Microsoft's Van Roekel.

It could be a decade or more before such capabilities become the norm. But Van Roekel and others believe that's inevitable -- and that from inauspicious beginnings, Web services will emerge as one of the Net's most meaningful contributions.



To: tonka552000 who wrote (21151)7/1/2003 2:05:28 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 89467
 
Bill Gates on Linux

Posted 6/30/2003 12:08 AM

usatoday.com

USA TODAY:There seems to be some worry at Microsoft about Linux and some of these Web-based things like Sim Desk that have popped up. Houston, Munich, and Beijing have all been considering using Linux-based products rather than going through Microsoft. How much of this is a concern?

Linux is the current OS competition, but it's no more threatening than OS/2. Remember OS/2?
By H. Darr Beiser, USA TODAY

Bill Gates: Well those are our current competitors. I mean, it's no different than in the past people used [IBM's operating system] OS/2.

USA TODAY: Nobody used OS/2.

BG: Are you kidding? I mean, let's be serious. That was IBM, a company 15 times our size. Name a bank that didn't use OS/2. OS/2 was IBM's product, and the IBM army marched behind that product. People always think today's competition is somehow different and unique in some way. Let's be serious. I mean, we've had to bet the company many times on big technological advances. We bet on the 16-bit PC. We bet on graphical user interface. We bet on the NT technology base. Now we're in the process of betting on a combination of technologies called .Net; Longhorn Web services go along with that. You always have to do something very dramatic to move things up to the next level. Who has the guts and the willingness to do risk-taking to get ink into the standard user interface? Who else is going to push that forward? Who else has the guts to get speech, get the recognition levels up, get the learning levels up in the standard interface? We've chosen to do that. If we didn't believe in those things we wouldn't be increasing the R&D budget the way that we are.

USA TODAY: There has been some criticism of the way in which you're been competing against Linux, and in The New York Times, assuming it was accurate, reporting that the e-mails in Europe talked about undercutting Linux at any cost, per se. How do you react to that, and where do you cross the line of that going back to some of the behaviors that surfaced in the Justice Department case?

BG: Well I'm not sure what you mean by undercutting. We will never have a price lower than Linux, in terms of just what you charge for the software. We compete on the basis of, if you look at the value you get out of the system and the overall cost that the system has that apply in our software. For any project, if you look at communications costs, hardware costs, personnel costs, all that, software licensing ranges — the highest you'd ever find is, like, 3% of any IT-type project. And so the question is can that 3% [compensate], in terms of how quickly you get the system set up? How much value you get out of that system, can it justify itself in that way? And that's the business that we're in every day.

USA TODAY: On May 14th, Orlando Ayala [Microsoft's senior VP for the Small and Midmarket Solutions & Partner Group, which aims to introduce Microsoft products to smaller companies and purchasers] in his e-mails authorizing him to draw from a special fund to offer the software set discounts or even free if necessary, under no circumstances lose against Linux. Has Microsoft changed its behavior patterns?

BG: The idea is that we're in a competitive situation, that we're willing to provide a better price. This is not a general problem. This is about education situations, and educational bids are very, very price sensitive, and we've always provided super low pricing for education. We're actually providing even lower pricing now for education then we ever have, but it's been unique pricing for us, literally since the company was founded. And yeah, we, on educational bids, we will meet competition. That's considered healthy pro-competitive behavior.

USA TODAY: Is there a scenario by which you would at some point consider porting Microsoft applications into Linux?

BG: There's no consideration of that at this point.



To: tonka552000 who wrote (21151)7/11/2003 9:59:32 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 89467
 
Microsoft stock plan a problem for others
____________________________

By JOHN COOK
SEATTLE POST-INTELLIGENCER REPORTER
Friday, July 11, 2003

Frank Artale knows the power of stock options.

From 1991 to 2000, the Brooklyn, N.Y., native accumulated thousands of stock options in one of the most valuable companies in the world.

"I am a proud, happy and fortunate beneficiary of the Microsoft stock option plan," said the former Windows NT manager.

So when Artale formed Bellevue software start-up Consera last year, it was a no-brainer to establish a stock option plan where employees could receive partial ownership in the young company.

Tuesday's announcement that Microsoft was scrapping options in favor of stock grants piqued Artale's interest not only because of his prior work experience, but also because of what it might mean for his start-up.

After all, nearly half of Consera's 30 employees are former Microsofties who decided to make the entrepreneurial leap. If the software start-up continues to grow, it will need to tap a pool of talented developers, marketers and sales people. In the Pacific Northwest, there is no better place to find those folks than Microsoft.

A Microsoft work force that is better compensated with a more stable stock plan could create challenges for entrepreneurs such as Artale.

"In general, this will increase retention at Microsoft," he said. "Basically, this is a pay raise, no ifs, ands or buts."

Although Artale could offer a job candidate more stock options as an enticement, he said those options do not have the liquidity of Microsoft's new plan.

"Therein lies the rub," Artale said. "From a compensation perspective ... most people are going to say let's take stock options out of the picture right now because everything over the last four years is worthless anyway, so let's talk about how I feed my family and buy a new car."

In other words, the golden handcuffs of stock options could be replaced by the silver-plated handcuffs of stock awards.

Former Microsoft manager Craig Eisler, chief executive of Redmond-based Action Engine, said Microsoft's new compensation program will make it harder for technology start-ups to recruit in the region.

"It is absolutely cash compensation now that Microsoft has on the table," said Eisler, whose 58-person company has raised $35 million. "Along with signing bonuses and all of the other tools they use, they now have a very big cash stick that they can wave around to retain and recruit. Certainly, we are going to keep our eye on how that plays out in our recruiting process."

Former Microsoft manager Dan Rosen, who now is managing partner of Frazier Technology Ventures, said it was easier for start-ups to recruit Microsoft employees before the option program was dropped.

"I have friends at Microsoft that say, 'The only thing holding me at the company is that I enjoy working at the company.' Now they are given something of real value," he said.

Microsoft's decision to ax stock options comes at a time when most of the high-tech industry is fighting to stop the Financial Accounting Standards Board from adopting rules that would make it a requirement to account for stock options as an expense. Those rules, which critics say are convoluted, could dramatically impair corporate earnings.

Microsoft, which began expensing options and awards this month, is breaking away from a high-tech contingent that includes Dell, Intel and the National Venture Capital Association.

But if those large, publicly traded technology companies follow Microsoft's lead in expensing options and awards, that could open the door for start-up companies in the battle to find and retain talent, according to some accounting experts. That's because fewer shares would be given to employees at the bigger companies.

"Start-ups, if they are competing for talent with companies like Microsoft, might not have to give out as much value in terms of options in order to attract these employees," said Brett Trueman, an accounting professor at UCLA's Anderson School of Management. "Now that Microsoft is expensing these costs, they may very well be more concerned about the bottom line and therefore the value of compensation they give out in the form of restricted stock may be less than they were giving out in terms of options."

Vinod Khosla, a venture capitalist with Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers, broke ranks with some of his Silicon Valley peers on the issue. He told the San Jose Mercury News last month that if larger companies were forced to expense options it could reduce the number of shares they provide to employees. That, in turn, could give start-ups an advantage in attracting management.

Jennifer Dowling, vice president of federal policy at the National Venture Capital Association, disagrees.

"Our fundamental position is that expensing is bad accounting, so it doesn't matter if you are a public or a private company," Dowling said.

Artale, the former Microsoft employee who grants stock options to all of Consera's employees, isn't getting too caught up in the debate. For the son of a UPS truck driver and civil servant, it is not so much about compensation.

"Someone comes to work for a start-up because they want to be at a start-up," he said.

seattlepi.nwsource.com



To: tonka552000 who wrote (21151)7/12/2003 3:29:39 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 89467
 
Intel chief sees no pickup yet

inq7.net



To: tonka552000 who wrote (21151)7/14/2003 7:54:06 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 89467
 
Eliminating Options at Microsoft

___________________________________

Editorial
The New York Times
July 14, 2003

The news from Redmond, Wash., is not good for anyone still hoping for a return of the financially exuberant 1990's. Microsoft, the software giant that minted hundreds of millionaires by doling out stock options to a generation of employees who happened to be at the right place at the right time, will no longer grant stock options.

The move reflects a change in business culture as well as the evolution of an iconic American corporation. There is nothing inherently wrong about rewarding employees with options — a form of compensation that is dependent on a company's future success. Many corporations, including The New York Times Company, have stock option plans, and options will likely remain an important fixture of Silicon Valley's entrepreneurial culture.

Options, however, have lost some of their luster because in the mania of the late-1990's financial bubble, they were sometimes abused. Some corporations relied on them excessively as a form of compensation, a practice that in some cases led to creative accounting. Some executives sought to manipulate quarterly earnings to cash out their options at a favorable price, with little regard for the long-term welfare of their company. They were also able to load up on options because accounting rules allowed them to be treated as though they were cost free and needn't be expensed.

As some companies review their practices, regulators should be tightening accounting rules and corporate governance standards to prevent the misuse of options. A new Securities and Exchange Commission rule requiring shareholder approval for any stock option awards is one welcome reform.

For Microsoft, the decision to move from options to restricted stock awards — whereby employees are granted shares outright rather than the option to buy shares in the future at a predetermined price — also signals a recognition that the company's days of exponential growth may be coming to an end. Bill Gates's software giant has become to the information age what General Motors was to the industrial age, a stable proxy for a vital economic sector.

As at other high-flying tech companies that have become healthy if stolid middle-aged entities, Microsoft's old stock option plan had become culturally divisive, separating employees hired in the gold rush years from more recent hires. A move to restricted stock awards is meant to create a more equitable environment.

Microsoft says that managers will be awarded shares only if they meet certain performance targets. That is the right approach. The last thing shareholders want to see is for companies to replace tarnished option plans with another form of compensation that top executives then turn around and misuse.

nytimes.com



To: tonka552000 who wrote (21151)7/15/2003 9:06:45 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 89467
 
Job exports may imperil U.S. programmers

By RACHEL KONRAD
AP BUSINESS WRITER
Sunday, July 13, 2003 · Last updated 11:16 a.m. PT

seattlepi.nwsource.com

SAN JOSE, Calif. -- Peter Kerrigan encouraged friends to move to Silicon Valley throughout the 1980s and '90s, wooing them with tales of lucrative jobs in a burgeoning industry.

But he lost his network engineering job at a major telecommunications company in August 2001 and remains unemployed. Now 43, the veteran programmer is urging his 18-year-old nephew to stay in suburban Chicago and is discouraging him from pursuing degrees in computer science or engineering.

"I told him, 'Unless you're planning to do this as a path to technical sales, don't do it,'" said Kerrigan, who lives in Oakland. "He won't be able to have a career designing and building stuff because all those jobs have moved to India."

Like many unemployed programmers, Kerrigan blames the sour labor market on offshore outsourcing - the migration of tech jobs to relatively low-paid contractors or locally hired employees in India, China, Russia and other developing countries.

The hemorrhaging of tens of thousands of technology jobs in recent years to cheaper workers abroad is already a fact of life - as inevitable, U.S. executives say, as the 1980s migration of Rust Belt manufacturing jobs to Southeast Asia and Latin America.

But a new wave of technology outsourcing - involving tasks that involve greater skills - could be cutting to the industry's bone, threatening to prolong the three-year U.S. economic downturn.

Some who oppose the trend, which such industry stalwarts as Hewlett-Packard, IBM, Dell and Microsoft are embracing, believe it could even usher in the end of American domination in technology.

"We're giving countries like China and India the support they need to build up their technology industries, and the result could disadvantage us in the long run," said Phil Friedman, an electrical engineer and chief executive of New York-based Computer Generated Solutions, a 1,200-employee software company that targets the apparel industry.

"We outsourced electronics manufacturing. We're closing steel mills. Every week, 400,000 people file for new unemployment claims," said Friedman, a 54-year-old Ukrainian native who immigrated in 1976. "At the same time, we're shipping tech jobs offshore - it's a shortsighted approach and cheats the American work force."

Cost-conscious executives have been shifting lower-level tech jobs in data entry and systems support abroad to cheaper labor markets for more than a decade. But now they are exporting highly paid, highly skilled positions in software development - jobs that have been considered intrinsic to Silicon Valley and tech hubs such as Seattle; Boston; and Austin, Texas.

Critics say it's the equivalent of exporting not just the automobile industry's assembly line jobs - but the core engineering and car design jobs, too.

Roughly 27,000 technology jobs moved overseas in 2000, according to a November study by Forrester Research. It predicts that number will mushroom to 472,000 by 2015 if companies continue to farm out computer work at today's frenzied pace.

According to Forrester, companies in the United States and Europe will spend 28 percent of their information technology budgets on overseas work in the next two years.

Boeing, Dell and Motorola have opened software development centers in Russia. Intel employs 400 full-time Russian software research engineers and nearly 200 others in marketing and sales, wireless Internet access and modem projects.

Santa Clara-based Intel entered the Russian market with a small contract project three years ago. But within months, the world's largest chip maker hired all the programmers who write compiler software to optimize the microprocessors' performance, and opened the Russia Software Development Center in Nizhny Novgorod.

"We intend to invest in the fastest-growing markets, and those are India, Russia and China - that's the long-term plan," Intel spokesman Chuck Mulloy said.

Microsoft is adding software development jobs at its India Development Center in Hyderabad, opened in 1999 to create versions of Windows for giant corporate computers. Bill Gates said late last year that the expansion was part of an estimated $400 million in corporate investments in the subcontinent.

On its corporate Web site, Microsoft lists dozens of Hyderabad openings, many requiring five years of experience, fluency in multiple computer languages, and college degrees in computer science - far from the hourly telemarketer jobs that financial services and insurance companies exported to the Philippines and elsewhere in the early '90s.

Some say sending those jobs abroad may cause American tech workers' wages to stagnate.

According to the nonpartisan Economic Policy Institute, non-inflation-adjusted wages for tech workers grew 1.7 percent between the fourth quarter of 2001 and the fourth quarter of 2002 - not enough to keep up with the period's inflation rate of 2.2 percent.

The average computer programmer in India costs $20 per hour in wages and benefits, compared to $65 per hour for an American with a comparable degree and experience, according to consulting firm Cap Gemini Ernst & Young.

But executives say outsourcing offers advantages beyond wage differences.

Jean-Marc Hauducoeur, a senior vice president at Cincinnati-based human resources consulting firm Convergys, said his 47,000-employee company will employ 6,000 customer service representatives and network engineers in India by year's end.

Convergys' average technical employee in India stays on the job for nearly three years - more than double the U.S. average, saving tens of thousands of dollars in recruitment and training per employee per year, he said.

"People in India are very ambitious and very well-educated, but they're also ready to invest in a company, and they have less of a tendency to move out of the company," Hauducoeur said.

Many U.S. corporate executives say they simply can't afford to overlook foreign computer workers - especially in India, which produces roughly 350,000 college engineering graduates annually.

Others say the genius of American enterprise is its leaders' knack for envisioning the next big thing - and workers' ability to redefine job roles and retrain. Americans pioneering developments in nanotechnology and biotech will have far more job security than simple programmers, they argue.

Bob Pryor, who heads the outsourcing practice of Cap Gemini Ernst & Young, said it's "naive" to think outsourcing software jobs could ruin America's tech dominance.

"The reality is that we live in a global economy and we compete against global players. We need to look at where we have strategic advantage - whether it's resources or skills," Pryor said. "It frees up people and dollars to do much more value-added strategic things for clients."

Marcus Courtney, a former contract worker for Microsoft and Adobe Systems and president of the Washington Alliance of Technology Workers, said many tech workers understand and even endorse free trade and globalization.

They even enjoy living on the cutting edge - taking courses in advanced computer languages, getting experience in a variety of business disciplines, and endorsing a philosophy of continuous improvement, he said.

But many find it tough to reconcile their macro-economic outlook with their own unemployment.

"We need to move beyond the idea that individuals can simply cope and retrain," said Courtney, whose 275-member union is asking Congress to study and possibly regulate offshore outsourcing. "Workers need a voice over their economic future and a voice against the executives making these unilateral economic decisions."

---

Rachel Konrad can be reached at rkonrad(at)ap.org



To: tonka552000 who wrote (21151)7/15/2003 9:22:00 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 89467
 
INVESCO and Avocent Invest $5.5 Million in VIEO, Inc.; Adaptive Application Infrastructure Management Leader to Use Investment to Expand Operations

Tuesday July 15, 8:04 am ET

biz.yahoo.com

AUSTIN, Texas, July 15 /PRNewswire/ -- VIEO, Inc., the leader in Adaptive Application Infrastructure Management (AAIM), today announced that INVESCO Private Capital and Avocent Corporation (Nasdaq: AVCT - News) have jointly invested a total of $5.5 million in the company bringing VIEO's total funding to approximately $45 million. VIEO will use the investment to fund the expansion of marketing, sales, manufacturing, distribution and support for the VIEO 1000 AAIM appliance, the first product that ensures application resources are available, on-demand, to satisfy business needs.

"What we find most interesting and exciting about VIEO is that the company has the opportunity to completely redefine the way application infrastructure resources are managed in an enterprise, ensuring that applications are always available and IT resources are aligned with a company's business objectives," said Alessandro Piol, general partner of INVESCO Private Capital.

"We are delighted that the investment community has taken notice of the great interest VIEO is getting in Fortune 1000 data centers and the high marks we've received from the industry analyst community," said Bob Fabbio, president and chief executive officer of VIEO. "While we weren't actively seeking additional funding, we recognize the importance of a strong balance sheet with prospects and customers. With the support of these new investors, VIEO is in a position to demonstrate strong leadership by expanding more aggressively while having the security of several years of funding in the bank."

The VIEO 1000 AAIM appliance was designed with research and technical input from more than 200 of the world's top data centers. It is the first product of its kind to ensure application resources are available, on demand, to satisfy business needs. It converges application-aware networking hardware with intelligent management software in a secure, purpose-built appliance to automatically measure, analyze, and control application resources. The VIEO 1000 enables companies to increase application quality of service and reduce management complexity and costs by better aligning IT assets with dynamic business demands.

VIEO has deployed the VIEO 1000 at VIEO Lighthouse Program member companies, a group of leading Fortune 1000-sized data centers and IT integrators who are currently beta testing the product. For more information, a press kit and product photos are available at vieo.com . For sales information please contact VIEO Sales at 512.257.3031 ext. 404 or info@vieo.com .

About INVESCO Private Capital

As an industry leader since 1982, INVESCO Private Capital, Inc. is one of the more established and active venture capital firms in the United States, with over $8.1 billion in assets under management and advisement. INVESCO Private Capital invests in early- and expansion-stage companies in the areas of communications, information technology, global commerce, and life sciences. Since inception, the INVESCO Private Capital team has invested over $1.2 billion in over 300 direct transactions. Unlike other firms that specialize in one niche of private capital, their strength is built on a breadth of knowledge across industries. Additional information can be obtained at www.invescoprivatecapital.com .

About Avocent Corporation

Avocent is the leading worldwide supplier of KVM (keyboard, video and mouse) switching, remote access and serial connectivity solutions that provide IT managers with access and control of multiple servers and network data center devices. Avocent's KVM solutions are distributed by the world's largest server manufacturers and installed in Fortune 1000 companies around the world. Avocent is headquartered in Huntsville, Ala. with locations across the globe. Visit www.avocent.com for more details.

About VIEO

VIEO is the leader in Adaptive Application Infrastructure Management (AAIM) delivering a new class of management product that ensures application resources are available, on demand, to satisfy business needs. VIEO has garnered strong industry recognition for the VIEO AAIM appliance including being named a dynamo in Organic IT management by Forrester Research, one of the IT industry's most promising new products for 2003 by IDG, the producers of the DEMO conference, one of the top "Products That Will Save the Day" by VAR Business, a 2003 "Top 10 Startup to Watch" by Network World and a "Top Startup to Watch" by Computer Reseller News. Headquartered in Austin, TX, VIEO has $45 million in funding from investors including Audax Group, Avocent, BMC Software, Dell, Inc., Eyes of Texas Partners, Flagship Ventures, INVESCO Private Capital, Rho Ventures, and TL Ventures.

VIEO and the VIEO logo are trademarks of VIEO, Inc. All rights reserved. All other trademarks or company names are trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective companies.

Contacts:
VIEO, Inc.
Pam O'Neal Mickelson
Director of Marketing Communications
poneal@VIEO.com
(512) 257-3031 x306

INVESCO Private Capital
Leigh Poggio
leigh_poggio@invesco.com
(212) 278-9692

Lois Paul & Partners
Mike Antonellis
mike_antonellis@lpp.com
(781) 782-5832