Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: American Spirit who wrote (419985)	6/28/2003 3:32:55 PM
From: Emile Vidrine	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

"Bush was not misled." Do you have any evidence for this statement? The president cannot have encyclopedic knowledge of every dept. and must rely upon the information given him by his advisers. When a group of advisers committed to a foreign nation deliberately feed the president misleading information, they can alter our nation's foreign policy. When this same group of advisers are aided by their Zionist comrades in the media who deliberately gloss over their lies and dual allegiance, it makes it possible to deceive even a well-meaning president. It is true that Bush, Cheney and Ashcroft are already polluted with the anti-American and anti-democratic virus of Christian Zionism, but shouldn't the advisers who deliberately mislead them be accountable for their treasonous behavior? Again, I agree that the buck must stop with Bush but the dual-loyalist advisers who deliberately mislead a president for the benefit of a foreign nation and foreign ideology should also be held accountable.

To: American Spirit who wrote (419985)	6/28/2003 4:53:58 PM
From: Jerrel Peters	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769670

From NonProfitWatch.org: Don't Support Teresa's Favorite Charity Environmental Defense (Fund) on Account of How the Group Serviced Enron at the Expense of the Environment, as discussed in the Extended Discussion above. The good work that the group carries out does not justify environmental malpractice as reflected by the California energy deregulation fiasco and the group's convenient public silence on Enron's environmentally disastrous pipeline through the Amazon, especially in light of the conflicts of interest and the cronyism described by NonprofitWatch.org. If you agree with the call to action, please tell a friend -- send them the extended discussion with a note urging them to not support Environmental Defense (Fund) and instead to give their support to other groups. Not convinced? Stay tuned for more damning information regarding Teresa's Environmental Defense (Fund) which makes one wonder whether the group shouldn't be called Corporate Defense Fund. nonprofitwatch.org