Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Heinz Blasnik- Views You Can Use -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: dvdw© who wrote (2827)	6/28/2003 5:11:37 PM
From: LLCF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4909

Certainly makes plenty of sense to me... but I think the most important thing is how central banks manage the supply of their currency. If they get crazy and print, gold will come back. If they don't, it won't. DAK

To: dvdw© who wrote (2827)	6/28/2003 5:21:39 PM
From: Box-By-The-Riviera™	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 4909

I'd say he's been notoriously wrong for over three years on that subject. Other than that, you might take it to a gold focused thread if you want someone to debate the gata vs. zeev points of view regarding supply and demand. bob johnson, for one, might be supportive of the zeev arguement, claude cormier might have a good supply/demand opinion. In the end, what the market says about price rulez, regardless of how it finally arrives to its judgement. in either case, the folks who are pro or con gold have left a well worn trail of documenting arguements for their positions for quite some time now. i didn't look it up, but i'd guess george cole didn't agree with him.