SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Hawkmoon who wrote (103334)6/28/2003 7:25:53 PM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Is Tony Blair the Hulk?
An insider account of the buildup to war with Iraq shows the British prime minister didn't kowtow to Bush -- but it won't reassure critics who opposed the rush to Baghdad.

- - - - - - - - - - - -
By Tina Brown - SALON

June 26, 2003 | Former Times of London editor Peter Stothard's new book, "Thirty Days," his Bob Woodwardian, up-close-and-personal diary of the scene at No. 10 Downing Street as Blair and his inner circle prepared for the war with Iraq, will be eagerly seized by the P.M.'s doting U.S. fans. It will not reassure British critics, however, like Claire Short, who think that the country's affairs are run by a small circle of the prime minister's court. But then, war cabinets tend to be close-knit and impatient with what they see as the less well-informed skeptics on the outside.

Stothard paints a portrait of a prime minister in a hurry, for whom the Labor Party and the House of Commons itself are just obstacles he has to navigate to get what he wants done.

Blair is now formidably tough. Perhaps he always was, beneath his mannerly charm. As Stothard notes, "He has grown used to winning arguments, to winning elections, to defeating opposition in his party, to almost destroying his official opposition in Parliament. He has discovered that he can absorb attack after attack and still be left standing." And, it seems, in the aftermath of war, the worst is yet to come.

Has Tony Blair turned into the Hulk? The hero of the new comic strip action flick, a young scientist called Bruce Banner, is a brilliant and diffident charmer until his moral ire is aroused; then he becomes a colossal mass of bright green muscle, able to smash everything around him. Like the Hulk, and unlike Bush, Blair doesn't flex the muscle unless pushed. When one of his team oversteps the mark in some moment of levity, Stothard describes how the normally genial Blair will shoot him "a look" -- a warning that the Bruce Banner persona might harden into something else. It explains why, in one memorable vignette, as they are about to leave for a trip to Washington, Foreign Secretary Jack Straw scuttles back into Downing Street to retrieve the prime minister's forgotten glasses -- a gesture of subservience hard to imagine coming from a Lord Carrington or a Colin Powell (though not, perhaps, from a Condi Rice).

Stothard makes a persuasive case that Blair's Iraq policy was based on conviction, not on kowtowing to America. The Bush/Blair relationship is one of deal partners, rather than prayer partners. No one at this point should attribute Blair's position on Iraq to sycophancy. "What amazes me is how happy people are for Saddam to stay," he ruminates to his team. "They ask why we don't get rid of Mugabe, why not the Burmese lot. Yes, let's get rid of them all. I don't because I can't, but when you can, you should."

Blair's implacable resolve derives from "layers of toughness," as he describes it, grown in the course of years of political fights. Some of it, however, is deeply personal.

One of the most difficult flak storms of his six years in office was the incident last year when his wife was torn apart in the debacle of "Cheriegate."

Readers didn't get more than a whiff of it here, but it was a six-week-long row about Mrs. Blair's errors of judgment when, as middleman to get a bargain on the purchase of an apartment in Bristol for her son Euan (who's at school there), she used the boyfriend of her exercise trainer, who turned out to be a convicted con man. Her error was not the mistake itself so much as embarrassing the Downing Street press office. Kept out of the loop by Cherie, they issued misleading statements and the tabloids went bananas. Mrs. Blair, until that point a respected lawyer, was depicted as either a flake, a liar or so hopelessly out of it that it made her ambitions to become a judge into a joke.

For Blair, it was a nightmare.

Only the husband of this proud professional woman could know how wounding it was to have the underbelly of Cherie's domestic improvising laid bare and ridiculed. It revealed the kind of ad hoc messiness that is the embarrassing secret in every frantic two-career marriage.

No doubt Blair feels keenly how god-awful it is for his family to live above the turmoil of the political store and feels much guilt about their invasions of privacy. You get the picture when Cherie shouts a harassed phone message down the stairs from the Downing Street flat to Blair's political team as 3-year-old Leo Blair bowls through the historic corridors with his plastic cart delivering chocolate wagon wheels to the prime minister. One longs to know what the more left-leaning Mrs. Blair really thought about going into Iraq. Was the Blair household divided like so many others? Cherie is missing in action from Stothard's book, and one feels her nonpresence is more than wifely discretion. Her wounds from Cheriegate are palpable.

Going after Cherie so mercilessly was the last fingernail the press could pull out. It left the prime minister impervious to criticism and ready for moral risk. His stand on Iraq was not so much a trial as a kind of liberation.



To: Hawkmoon who wrote (103334)6/28/2003 8:01:14 PM
From: marcos  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
Actually Castro does hold 'elections', just not meaningful ones, so agreed with the sense of what you say, on that point ....... and among the majority it hasn't been for a long time due to 'plata o plomo' - there is precious little plata in the country, and not much plomo used anymore [three bullets for recent hijackers being a notable exception] ... but here again, agreed with the sense of what you say, because 'silver or lead' is standing behind all cubanos, all the time

Fact remains however, that the majority quite genuinely side with Castro against the Land-of-Plattismo .... the US is tainted here, quite badly tainted in its name, and not doing much to wash off the taint either ... freeing Elián was a good thing, that showed that the majority of norteamericanos found family values weightier than partisan political considerations .... gestures like this go a long way in hearts and minds - vacating Guantánamo and having your congress make an abject apology for occupying it all these years, that would be helpful .... drop the bloqueo, there's another, let your college kids go there for easter break, pollute those hearts and minds with libertine rhythms, even, sigh, that lamentable rap ...... send a piana to Habana - sendapiana.com

My favourite dance partner here is a cubana, her mother has been to visit twice, stayed the last time two months or more, she is from a village not far from a place important in the mythology of el movimiento 26 julio .... just a normal mother, from normal people, no position high in current hierarchy or anything .... she gets pretty candid once relaxed and familiar with you, and she allows that perhaps they could do better than Castro, but they sure as hell don't want John L O'Sullivan either

You'll recall him as the coiner of 'Manifest Destiny', the spokesman for slavers who wanted the US to take lands to its south, for the working of captive negros .... this movement got Tejas, then all the northern half of México, but they never got Cuba until much later, half a century, when the cubanos had all but completely shaken off rule by europeans, and then Hearst said to Remington, you supply the pictures, i'll supply the war ... which he did, and thusly was imposed on the cubano a man called Platt, from which comes plattismo, an obscenity as a cubanismo, and indeed by any reasonable measure

'If I'm a leader of a organized criminal enterprise and I move to your town, I'll eventually run it'

Precisely what Platt did ... well i guess the first Rooseveldt was actually the 'leader', but you know what i mean ... and Platt wasn't the last, there came a long line, with Batista at the end ..... Castro freed them from the Batistas, whatever else you say about him that remains true, and you can't soil that in the minds of the average cubano, no point in trying

You and i are not far apart on what we'd like to see for Cuba, not at all maybe .... it's on how cubanos get to that stage though, where any difference comes in .... the US as a state should just absolutely butt out, imho, its name is tainted and it can do no good here .... as citizens sure, along with your fellow americanos, invade the place, take some ideas and spread them, soak up some sun in exchange, make some friends by listening not preaching, this will work well ..... but the change itself must come from cubanos, the river is not yours to push, and it doesn't push so good anyway