Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bdog who wrote (129968)	6/29/2003 3:57:21 PM
From: jackmore	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

I don't know what's of less value, the posters that constantly carp about one pet peeve or another, or those who proclaim to be Q investors, but never pass up a chance to take a shot at IJ, or capitalize on some Q negative, however small, while constantly offering positive spin for Nokia. Actually there's only one of these that I can think of. He's loaded with facts about GSM deployments, issues, and plans - to the point that I'm suspicious that he has inside sources. He may even be on their payroll, or be paid fees of some sort. We'll never know. While he has some Q shares, I would bet they are a very small fraction of his portfolio. They are only there so he can say he's a Q investor; so he can claim to be objective - to be technology neutral - on SI and elsewhere, and in letters he writes to regulators etc., championing GSM. Everything he writes is a grain of salt twice removed. All of us have vested interests. The majority of us are open about them, some conceal them, and some proclaim them falsely.