SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Auric Goldfinger's Short List -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: afrayem onigwecher who wrote (11806)6/30/2003 1:17:04 AM
From: Sir Auric Goldfinger  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 19428
 
WHICH MEANS YOUR CRAP WILL FALL EVEN HARDER AND SOONER THAN LATER

As there will be no shorts to cover only retail fish selling,lol.



To: afrayem onigwecher who wrote (11806)6/30/2003 12:30:32 PM
From: StockDung  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 19428
 
PICKPOCKETS' PRIDE By CHRISTOPHER BYRON

June 30, 2003 -- I read a terrific little book the other day. If you can get beyond its sappy title - "Hug Your Customer: The Proven Way to Personalize Sales and Achieve Astounding Results," by Jack Mitchell - the wisdom in this book is both obvious and undeniable: To be a success in business, just treat your customers with attentiveness and respect, and you will have them as customers for life.
That's a lesson the executives of the National Association of Securities Dealers apparently have yet to learn. Last week, the arm of the group that runs the Nasdaq electronic stock market announced that Nasdaq is abandoning its two-year-long effort to reform the fraud-drenched over-the-counter penny stock market functioning in its midst.

That was bad enough. But in trying to put a happy-face gloss on the proceedings, the organization issued a press release that must have insulted the intelligence of every investor who read it.

Instead of 'fessing up to the truth of the matter - that it is giving up the OTC Bulletin Board reform effort as a cost-saving measure - the release claimed that scrapping the cleanup is one of several steps Nasdaq is taking to enhance the quality of its services, and thereby to strengthen the exchange's position as "the best market in the world for investors." I mean, honestly, guys, was that necessary?

This flailing effort at spin control belies the real agenda of Wall Street as a whole, and of Nasdaq in particular: to say or do whatever it takes, no matter how preposterous or misguided, to separate retail customers from their money. It also underscores why public confidence in the markets is at an all-time low.

Wall Street is one of the few places on earth where the people who guard the bank are also the ones best positioned to rob it. So, every time a cleanup drive falters, or a corporate fat-cat pays a civil fine and goes back to work "without admitting or denying guilt," the perception is reinforced that the stock market is a rigged game in which the rich and the clever get to steal from the stupid and the poor.

Now comes Nasdaq's absurd assertion that the best way to serve the interests of investors is, in effect, to tell the pick-pockets of Wall Street that it's once again going to be business as usual on the OTC Bulletin Board.



The Bulletin Board is just the latest incarnation of what Nasdaq itself once was: the original "over the counter" market for stocks so speculative, shaky and volatile that the New York Stock Exchange would not even permit them to be listed for trading by its member firms.

THOUGH Nasdaq has struggled mightily to escape its past, the Securities and Exchange Commission has never let it off the hook, and in 1990 the SEC issued a regulation requiring Nasdaq to provide real-time market quotes for stocks so cheesy and fraud-soaked that Nasdaq wouldn't list them on its own exchange.

This became the OTC Bulletin Board - home to stocks of bankrupted and ruined companies, with bogus products and fraudulent financial statements.

In 1999, the SEC approved what amounted to a half-hearted effort to clean up the mess, by ordering that the OTC Bulletin Board cease providing quotes for any companies that had not begun filing timely financial reports to the SEC.

But this in fact accomplished nothing, since the heart of the problem - market manipulation by unscrupulous Nasdaq traders - remained completely unaddressed.

By 2000, the man who headed the National Association of Securities Dealers at the time, Frank Zarb, had gotten the bright idea that Nasdaq could cash in on the IPO boom by itself going public.

But the SEC stipulated, as a condition of doing so, that the OTC Bulletin Board be reformed into an actual exchange, with minimum listing standards and regulatory oversight to reduce volatility and to weed out the swindlers.

Thereafter, the IPO and tech bubbles popped, and Nasdaq has been knocked on its keester. So Nasdaq's new man, Robert Greifeld, has pulled the plug on the IPO idea, as well as Nasdaq's plans to turn the OTC Bulletin Board into an exchange.

What a travesty.

HERE are a few of the stocks that have made news on the OTC Bulletin Board in recent days. They are typical of what has been going on there for years now, and Nasdaq's decision to abandon reform of the market means the future promises more of the same.

* TheGlobe.com Inc.: The granddaddy of all IPO bubble stocks. This dot-com trash stock soared 1,000 percent, to $97, in its very first trade as a public company five years ago, only to collapse back to 10 cents and insolvency and be ejected onto the OTC Bulletin Board in the tech-wreck that followed.

Though TGLO's revenues continue to shrink and its losses, which cumulatively top $218 million, continue to soar, the stock rocketed from 10 cents to $2.50 per share in this spring's stock market rally. In the last two weeks the price has predictably collapsed, plunging nearly 50 percent in value as pump-and-dump speculators have cashed in and fled the shares.

* EChapman Inc.: This Baltimore-based money management firm was dumped last summer from Nasdaq onto the OTC Bulletin Board, where it continued to trade. Last week, federal prosecutors charged the company's founder and controlling shareholder, Nathan Chapman, with 39 counts of securities fraud for using $5 million of Maryland state pension fund money to prop up his company's stock price on the market, and for gifts and financial support to various women.

Since going public in the spring of 2000, EChapman shares have plunged from $9 to two cents.

* Wizbang Technologies Inc.: This hilariously named company, based in Victoria, B.C., claims to hold a license "to distribute various high-tech products that are used to record information transferred from distant sources like aircraft and satellites." The company has no employees, less than $10,000 in balance sheet cash, and less than $83,000 in annual income.

But the stock is traded on the OTC Bulletin Board, where it tripled in price, to 15 cents per share, two weeks ago, giving the company a market value of $1.5 million on a business that, for all practical purposes, appears not to exist.

* Shep Technologies Inc.: This Vancouver, B.C. penny stock claims to have a technology that powers cars by capturing the energy released by slowing them down.

The "go-by-stopping" company, incorporated in the Isle of Man, has $4,000 in cash and one employee. Yet between June 10 and 24, the company's stock soared from 75 cents to $3, giving Shep Technologies a momentary market value of more than $60 million. At that point, an avalanche of stock was dumped onto the market, causing the price to fall by nearly 50 percent from Wednesday to Friday of last week.

* Even Nasdaq itself trades on the OTC Bulletin Board. The group issued shares in itself in private placements to NASD members and others beginning in 2000, and those shares have been quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board ever since.

After falling almost without letup last year, from $16.50 in July 2002 to barely $5 this last April, the shares have inched back up to $8. And last week they were up again, to $8.25 per share, as news began to spread that the exchange isn't about to do anything so silly as to waste its money on draining the swamp where its very own shares have begun to recover.

Bottom line for the folks who run Nasdaq? Maybe it's a bit much to ask anyone on Wall Street to "hug his customer." But if they can't follow the advice of Jack Mitchell, whose Connecticut clothing store is the go-to haberdashery for half the CEOs on the Fortune 500, then maybe they can at least refrain from issuing baloney-packed press releases that insult the intelligence of anyone who reads them.

If you can't hug your customer, at least don't spit in his face.

* Please send e-mail to: cbyron@nypost.com



To: afrayem onigwecher who wrote (11806)7/1/2003 3:17:28 AM
From: StockDung  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 19428
 
PolyMedica warns may revise 2002, 2003 results

LOS ANGELES, June 30 (Reuters) - Medical products maker PolyMedica Corp. (PLMD.O) said on Monday it may need to expense past costs for consumer advertising, a change that would result in lower profits for fiscal 2002 and 2003 as well as first quarter 2004.

The Woburn, Massachusetts-based company, known for its Liberty brand of diabetes testing supplies, said it is still discussing the issue with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, which has questioned PolyMedica's policies for capitalization and amortization of advertising costs related to the acquisition of new customers.

The company's shares, which fell 72 cents to close at $45.79 on Nasdaq, traded as low as $35.00 after hours on Instinet.

If the company were to make the revisions, income per share before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle for fiscal years 2003 and 2002 would be $2.61 and $1.76, respectively, compared with the previously reported $3.21 and $2.38.

In addition, under historical expensing of advertising costs, PolyMedica said earnings per share guidance for its fiscal 2004 first quarter ending June 30, would be 66 cents to 72 cents, compared with previous guidance of 84 cents to 90 cents.

A spokeswoman for PolyMedica said the company routinely discloses in SEC filings and on conference calls its method for amortizing advertising expenditures as well as how its results would be affected if the costs were expensed at the time they were incurred.

The company said it is continuing to cooperate with an ongoing U.S. Department of Justice investigation into alleged health care fraud within the Medicare plan for the elderly, but there has been no resolution of the probe.



To: afrayem onigwecher who wrote (11806)7/1/2003 3:17:28 AM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 19428
 
PolyMedica warns may revise 2002, 2003 results

LOS ANGELES, June 30 (Reuters) - Medical products maker PolyMedica Corp. (PLMD.O) said on Monday it may need to expense past costs for consumer advertising, a change that would result in lower profits for fiscal 2002 and 2003 as well as first quarter 2004.

The Woburn, Massachusetts-based company, known for its Liberty brand of diabetes testing supplies, said it is still discussing the issue with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, which has questioned PolyMedica's policies for capitalization and amortization of advertising costs related to the acquisition of new customers.

The company's shares, which fell 72 cents to close at $45.79 on Nasdaq, traded as low as $35.00 after hours on Instinet.

If the company were to make the revisions, income per share before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle for fiscal years 2003 and 2002 would be $2.61 and $1.76, respectively, compared with the previously reported $3.21 and $2.38.

In addition, under historical expensing of advertising costs, PolyMedica said earnings per share guidance for its fiscal 2004 first quarter ending June 30, would be 66 cents to 72 cents, compared with previous guidance of 84 cents to 90 cents.

A spokeswoman for PolyMedica said the company routinely discloses in SEC filings and on conference calls its method for amortizing advertising expenditures as well as how its results would be affected if the costs were expensed at the time they were incurred.

The company said it is continuing to cooperate with an ongoing U.S. Department of Justice investigation into alleged health care fraud within the Medicare plan for the elderly, but there has been no resolution of the probe.



To: afrayem onigwecher who wrote (11806)7/2/2003 4:45:43 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 19428
 
Companies Fail to Heed SEC’s Deadline For Insider Trading Disclosure


AccountingWEB US - July 02, 2003 - Dozens of small- and mid-cap companies have failed to comply with a Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) deadline for them to file insider trading information on their websites, according to a survey by investor relations consultants Blunn & Company Inc.
The survey of 300 small- and mid-cap companies found that 11% had failed to meet the SEC’s June 30, 2003 deadline. All of the companies surveyed are included in the Standard & Poor’s Small-Cap and Mid-Cap indexes.

"Our surveys have shown time and again that public companies are not managing their corporate websites effectively, and in many cases their sites are in a state of neglect. That so many companies should fail to meet such a widely publicized requirement is really quite shocking," said Dominic Jones, head of Blunn & Company’s online investor relations research and consulting practice.

Under the SEC requirements mandated by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act companies must post details of transactions by insiders on their corporate websites or link to individual filings or a list of them on a third-party site like the SEC’s EDGAR database. However, a Blunn & Company survey on July 1, 2003 found that 22 out of 200 small-cap and 11 out of 100 mid-cap companies had not met the requirement.

An earlier survey by Blunn & Company of corporate governance disclosure on corporate websites found similar poor practices by small- and mid-cap US companies. That survey, released in April 2003, found that only 8% of these companies in the study had separate corporate governance sections on their sites, 6% posted codes of conduct and 8% published corporate governance guidelines online. By comparison, 44% of US large-caps in the same survey had corporate governance sections on their websites.

To assist companies, Blunn & Company has created a set of best practices for companies wishing to provide insider transaction information on their websites in formats that will make it easier for investors to obtain and use the information. The guidelines are available free online on the firm’s professional development site.



To: afrayem onigwecher who wrote (11806)7/2/2003 6:39:59 PM
From: Sir Auric Goldfinger  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 19428
 
Today's Humor: go to Google & punch in: "weapons of mass destruction" Then hit "I am feeling lucky" button (I know u are) Read results, LOL



To: afrayem onigwecher who wrote (11806)7/2/2003 11:03:57 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 19428
 
eUniverse Delays Filing of Fiscal Year 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K

LOS ANGELES, July 1 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- eUniverse, Inc. (Nasdaq:EUNI) (the "Company") announced today that it has filed a Form 12b-25 with the Securities and Exchange Commission with respect to its annual report on Form 10-K for fiscal year 2003. As announced on May 6, 2003, the Company intends to restate its previously reported quarterly financial results for fiscal year 2003. The Company's preparation of its restated quarterly financial statements and its full fiscal year 2003 financial statements is ongoing, as is the review and audit of the Company's financial statements by its independent auditors. The Company intends to make its annual and restated filings as soon as practicable, but cannot state with certainty when such filings will occur. The Company's goal, however, is to be in a position to release information concerning its financial results for the 2003 quarterly and fiscal year periods in the near future, irrespective of the status of its Form 10-K.

About eUniverse

eUniverse, Inc. ( www.euniverse.com ) is an entertainment network that provides value-added content, goods and services to consumers worldwide. The company's many popular destination Web sites attract millions of visitors, who purchase entertainment, lifestyle and health-related content and products from eUniverse. The company's network includes Flowgo ( www.flowgo.com ), one of the largest entertainment Web sites according to Nielsen/NetRatings; comedy site MadBlast ( www.madblast.com ); dating site Cupid Junction ( www.cupidjunction.com ); and one of the largest e-mail newsletter networks, delivering content to many millions of subscribers with such titles as Infobeat, IntelligentX and GossipFlash.

Safe Harbor Statement

Information contained in this press release contains "forward-looking statements" which can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as "believes," "expects," "may," "should," "anticipates" or "forecasts" or the negative thereof. Such statements are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions about our business. No assurances can be given that the future results or events covered by such forward-looking statements will be achieved, and we assume no obligation to update any such forward-looking statements. The factors which could cause actual results or events to differ materially from those suggested by any such statements include, but are not limited to, the possibility that the Company's internal review of its historical financial statements, or the investigation by the Audit Committee of the Company's Board of Directors of the matters surrounding the Company's previously disclosed restatement and accounting issues, uncovers additional issues or results in a determination to further restate our financial statements. The preceding matters constitute cautionary statements identifying important factors with respect to such forward-looking statements, including certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to vary materially from the future results covered in such forward-looking statements. Other factors could also cause actual results to vary materially from the future results covered in such forward-looking statements.

For further information, please contact Brett Brewer of eUniverse, Inc., +1-310-215-1001.

SOURCE eUniverse, Inc.

CO: eUniverse, Inc.

ST: California

SU:

Web site: euniverse.com

prnewswire.com

07/01/2003 17:02 EDT



To: afrayem onigwecher who wrote (11806)7/10/2003 11:13:58 AM
From: StockDung  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 19428
 
Discovery Abuse Leads to Case Dismissal
U.S. judge finds 'repeated and flagrant' disregard for orders by plaintiffs' lawyers

Mark Hamblett
New York Law Journal
07-10-2003

Attorney misbehavior has prompted a federal judge to dismiss a suit claiming that an equity group preyed on an Internet company by lending it money and then driving its stock into the ground.

In the so-called death spiral financing case, Internet Law Library v. Southridge Capital Management, 01 Civ. 6600, Southern District Judge Robert L. Carter said Tuesday that the "harsh" sanction of dismissal was warranted because plaintiffs' lawyers showed "repeated and flagrant disregard for the court's orders" when they attempted an end-run around restrictions on discovery with broad-ranging subpoenas.

The attorneys -- James W. Christian and Gary Jewell of Christian, Smith & Jewell in Houston; John O'Quinn of O'Quinn, Laminack & Pirtle of Houston; and O'Quinn's local counsel, Maryann Peronti of New York's Koerner Silberberg & Weiner -- indicated they would appeal the ruling.

Internet Law Library specializes in legal research and litigation support services. In order to survive and finance an expansion of its business in 2000, it reached an agreement to obtain $28 million in financing through Southridge Capital Management and an off-shore entity, Cootes Drive LLC.

The financing agreement called for a $25 million equity line and a $3 million preferred stock purchase that gave Cootes Drive the right to convert preferred stock to common stock.

Internet Law Library, now ITIS, claimed that Southridge, Cootes and their agents promised to refrain from selling ITIS stock for one year after the closing of the agreement, and also pledged not to manipulate the stock to depress its price.

But Southridge, the lawsuit claimed, proceeded to do just that. The suit charged that Cootes Drive broker Thomas Kernaghan began aggressively short selling the stock, driving down the price and putting Cootes in a position to exercise a "reset" provision in the agreement converting 139 preferred shares for 3,137,907 shares of ITIS common stock.

Even worse, from the position of ITIS and company chairman Hunter M.A. Carr, was that the decline in stock price from a high of $7 per share to a low of about 18 cents per share excused Cootes Drive from its obligation to fund the $25 million equity line of credit.

The suit sought $300 million in damages, disgorgement of profits and attorney fees. ITIS also claimed that Southridge and its principals and agents were experienced practitioners of the scheme and had used similar tactics on dozens of companies nationwide, using death spiral financing with so-called "toxic convertibles," and immediate, aggressive short selling. Christian released a statement Wednesday arguing that Southridge and other firms wrecked hundreds of companies in what "we believe to be the largest commercial fraud in U.S. history."

But Cootes Drive and Southridge claimed they stood to gain little from the depression of the stock price. Cootes Drive counter-sued charging securities fraud, and it sought an order forcing the company to complete its stock conversion.

Perrie W. Weiner, head of Piper Rudnick's securities group in Los Angeles and co-counsel for Southridge with Los Angeles attorney Michael S. Rosenblum, said the suit was only one of several he has handled for Southridge and the cases "either settle or are voluntarily dismissed."

"These are companies where no one else will provide financing. They are high risk investments and they go in with their eyes open knowing exactly what the terms are," Weiner said. "In each case, the allegations are groundless and meritless.

"If there was short selling, and that's a big if, it would not be market manipulation," he said.

Nonetheless, Carter rejected the defendant's motions to dismiss the case last July. Taking the allegations as true for the purposes of the motion, he said the "economics involved, despite their assertions to the contrary, gave defendants an incentive to manipulate ITIS stock."

DISCOVERY DISPUTE

With the case still alive, the parties moved to the discovery dispute that led Carter to order the dismissal sanction Tuesday.

In September, the defendants asked the judge for a protective order for all document production. The reason, they claim, was that the plaintiffs were using discovery to look for new plaintiffs. For their part, the plaintiffs claimed their document requests were intended to show that Southridge and others had engaged in a pattern of market manipulation.

"Taking into account plaintiffs' and defendants' arguments, the court placed its trust in plaintiffs' sense of restraint and denied the protective order," Carter said in his ruling. "The court indicated that any information gained in discovery was not to be used to identify new clients or initiate new litigation but that it could be used to 'locate additional witnesses or join new parties on a showing of good cause.' "

The plaintiffs' attorneys, Carter said, then proceeded to request "every manner of discovery from defendants and nonparties with regard to all companies that bore resemblance to the way in which ITIS was financed or its stock was sold," serving subpoenas to the National Association of Securities Dealers and the National Securities Clearinghouse Corporation on trading in ATSI Communications and several funds that ATSI had sued in a unrelated lawsuit before Southern District Judge Lewis Kaplan.

Before Kaplan, Carter said, Peronti "misrepresented" that the subpoenas were issued with the permission of Carter.

Kaplan barred the plaintiffs from using the subpoenaed information in the ATSI case, and sent Peronti back to Carter, who quashed the subpoenas at a June 9, 2003, conference and ordered Peronti and lead plaintiffs' lawyer Gary M. Jewell of Christian, Smith & Jewell in Houston not to make "any other efforts in this regard," or face dismissal of the case.

ACTING IN 'BAD FAITH'

But the next day, Carter said, the plaintiffs' lawyers notified the defense they would be "serving a subpoena on the NASD seeking every short sale made since March 30, 1999, irrespective of the identity of the stock or the trader."

Carter quashed the subpoenas immediately.

And when the plaintiffs argued that his phrase "in this regard" was vague, Carter said: "The issue of nonparty trading records was never raised and in making this unsupported claim to this court as well as to Kaplan, plaintiffs all but fatally jeopardize their credibility.

"In issuing the ATSI subpoenas, plaintiffs not only violated and misrepresented the court's ruling to Kaplan, but they also attempted to violated the discovery stay mandated by the PSLRA (Private Securities Litigation Reform Act) in the ATSI case," the judge said.

"On its own, plaintiffs' abuse of the subpoena power would justify severe sanctions," he said, adding that in making the argument about the vagueness of his order, "Plaintiffs seem to believe that by playing innocent, they can escape their duty to be a responsible litigant.

"Based on their disregard for the court's order and discovery rules in the past, the court can only conclude that their behavior with regard to the latest subpoena was willful and in bad faith, just as it was with the ATSI subpoenas," he said.

Noting the "harshness of dismissal," Carter said he considered other sanctions would be ineffective "considering the circumstances of plaintiffs' transgressions."

Christian called the sanction "inappropriate" in a statement.

"As officers of the court we respect the order of any federal judge, including the order of Judge Robert L. Carter," he said. "However we feel this sanction is inappropriate for the conduct alleged. We intend, respectfully, to pursue all legal and equitable remedies available to us. All legal pursuits have victories and defeats. This recent ruling will not deter our team of lawyers from pursuing legally and equitably justice for our clients."



To: afrayem onigwecher who wrote (11806)7/10/2003 12:25:00 PM
From: StockDung  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 19428
 
July 10, 2003 Stocklemon Reports On Spear Jackson. Part 1 (OTCBB: SJCK.OB)

In the early part of the twentieth century, cult figure Aleister Crowley reintroduced the world to black magik and devil worship.  Aleister relished in his self proclaim title, “Wickedest Man Alive”.  In the early part of the twenty first century, we have a new Crowley upon us, Dennis Crowley.  This Crowley also does magic, he has an uncanny ability to make shareholder equity disappear.  Dennis Crowley is the notorious stock promoter who is currently the CEO of Spear Jackson Industries.  Stocklemon believes that Spear Jackson is an over hyped stock that is setting itself up to disappoint both its investors and its employees.

Spear and JacksonSpear and Jackson is an old-line tool company that has a history but has faced recent troubles due to the competition in the tool market for less expensive imports and declining margins on exports.  The former owners of Spear and Jackson, US Industries, has been trying to sell this business for over a year before Crowley came in, but no one wanted to buy it.  Then, on September 6, 2002, Spear and Jackson was basically given away to Dennis Crowley for 3,543,281 shares of a shell with no trading history and assumption of a note for 150,000 pounds.  If we assess the price of the stock at the same price that Crowley bought stock on the same day, the purchase price of Spear Jackson was just north of $1 million.

On the same day the deal was closed, Crowley financed the company with $2 million dollars in exchange for 6,005,561 shares (35 cents a share). 

Let’s be Realistic Here

Being generous, Stocklemon will say this company was sold $1.2 million (we are not discounting for the illiquidity of the shell).  This sale number was determined by an Independent Valuation done for a US Industries, a NYSE company.  Therefore, we can assume that the $1.2 million figure is fair and reasonable if not generous because the stock was basically worthless.

It is 9 months later and now the company has a market value of $183 million. 

If Dennis Crowley were the CEO of the Year and should be placed in the CEO Hall of Fame then maybe he would increase the value of the company by 100% in 9 months.  If he did 200% he would be a business god. But to have the value of the company increase to $180 million in 9 months, it is the opinion of Stocklemon that he is just a damn good stock promoter.  After all, why could he not spin this magic with Mega Pro, another tool company, before the Spear Jackson acquisition?   Has he been saving all of his “business savvy” for this deal, and was afraid to make anything good happen in the plethora of “dog” stocks he was involved in the past?

C’mon Folks, we all know that Crowley is not a “tool” guy.   He is a stock promoter who likes to race Ferraris. 

The $50 million Question…hold on to your hats.

On January 13, 2003, Spear and Jackson filed a 10k that was signed off by their former accountants BDO Dunwoody, a respected firm out of Canada.  In this filing, the company shows a pension fund liability of $30.771 million.  Five months later the company amends the 10k but this time uses the accountants of Sherb and Co. (who we will go into later).  This time the same 10k show the pension fund as an asset of $14.962 million.  How Can This Be?

Why would US Industries sell a company with $15 million in assets for shares in an OTC shell?  They wouldn’t.  But they would sell a company with a huge pension liability

Stocklemon believes that the answer to this is simple….FUZZY ACCOUNTING.  The best part of the whole filing is that change was made without even a footnote as to how a liability becomes an asset.  I guess Crowley is a magician and poof can turn a 30 mil dollar liability into a $15 mil dollar asset.

Stocklemon is concerned about the people who work for Spear Jackson who might have their pension fund at risk, as the company is not paying down as much as they should because they recorded the pension as a net actuarial loss.  Many employees have worked for Spear Jackson for years, and to have their company being run by a stock promoter is not giving dignity to their job or more importantly stability to their pension.

It gets better……..Crowley has no one to answer to because as written in their filings, the company does not have any committees.

NO AUDIT COMMITTEE

NO PENSION COMMITTEE

Accountants

In order to judge the validity of the numbers that are currently being presented by Spear and Jackson, we must rely on the credibility of their accountants Sherb and Co, which classifies themselves as, “Among Top Auditing Firms in the US” www.sherbcocpa.com/pages/1/index.htm

We don’t see them here. toptenlinks.com

Funny, we did not know they were that big.  Actually, the CFO of the former parent of Spear and Jackson had never even heard of Sherb and Co.  Maybe that is because the majority of Sherb’s clients are OTC companies that trade below .25 cents.  Stocklemon’s favorite client of Sherb is WYRE, the boiler room stock of Adnan Kashoggi and Regis Possinno. 

It Gets Better………

Among other complaints, Sherb is currently a co-defendant in a class action lawsuit filed against pink sheet companyVoiceFalsh Networks.  In the complaint, Sherb is charged with misrepresenting and inflating the numbers for VoiceFlash.

rabinlaw.com

Crowley’s Old Deals

All of the companies listed below are companies (and their current price) that we believe to have involvement from Crowley.   Let’s see if it is a record of building companies or destroying companies.

1.      GSFT- .18

2.      CPCY- .07

3.      ISOB-   .10

4.      ERAW- can not find anywhere

5.      SHAR- .25

6.      BMAL- delisted

We have saved our favorite for last…Beverly Hills Limited.

(BTLD .0008)  Crowley was the largest shareholder of BLTD and the CEO was his good friend Mark Barhonovich.  The Investor Relations Contact was a woman named Yolanda Valaquez.

Barhonovich has since been charged by the SEC for Fraud.  sec.gov

And Yolanda….well read below

International Media Solutions

During the past two months, Stocklemon has been reporting on the relationship with Telkonet and the Orlando Boiler room International Media Solutions (IMS).  IMS has been busy working the phone for Spear Jackson, calling any stockbroker that will hear their story.

International Media Solutions is owned by Yolanda Valaquez….Yes the same Yolanda Valaquez who “worked” his Beverly Hills Limited (BLTD) stock which went from a $12 to its current price of .0008 sportsbyline.com

Stocklemon believes that the relationship between Crowley and Valaquez is now extended beyond a simple stock promotion and has turned into an enterprise.  A pattern is forming with the way they sell stocks to the public.

The boiler room business is not for long and Stocklemon believes that the walls will be closing in around International Media Solutions in the near future.  Just last month, the SEC cracked down hard on an Orlando based boiler-room Corporate Relations Group.  According to SEC documents,

The Court further held that CRG violated Section 15(a) of the Exchange Act by acting as an unregistered broker. CRG directed its sales force to contact registered representatives and encourage them to pitch the securities of CRG's clients to their customers. Then, once the customer bought the security, CRG's sales personnel would submit proof of the purchase to CRG and collect compensation based upon the transaction. Similarly, the Court found that CRG and Stratcomm violated Section 15(a) by acting as an unregistered dealer. The Court determined that CRG acted as a dealer by buying and selling securities for its own account through its Costa Rican nominees, Fondo and Oportunidad, and that Stratcomm acted as a dealer by selling approximately one million shares of its common stock to the public and buying stock from other investors to make delivery to the new investors. sec.gov

 

Stay Tuned for Part Two

Part two of this report will focus on the business of Spear Jackson and how it has not grown in comparison to stock price.  Furthermore, the report will focus on the how earning are being created by SJ by accounting tricks. 

Conclusion

A chain is only as strong as its weakest link.  In this case there are many weak links that might crack soon.   Stocklemon would like the government to look into the accounting of this company and force them to explain to their shareholders and their employees the status of the under funded pension.  Do the people involved with this company live in a cave?  Do they not watch the news?  Do they not see the importance of corporate governance?  Yes, the hands of the law do work slowly, but Stocklemon believes when the game is all played out, we might have a new Wickedest Man Alive.

Disclaimer:
Stocklemon.com does not guarantee in any way that it is providing all of the information that may be available. We recommend that you do your own due diligence before buying or selling any security.   At any times the principals of Stocklemon.com might hold a position in any of the securities profiled on the site. Stocklemon.com will not report when a position is initiated or covered. Each investor must make that decision based on his/her judgment of the market. 



To: afrayem onigwecher who wrote (11806)7/10/2003 12:51:08 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 19428
 
Tis true what Stocklemon says about Adnan Kashoggi and Regis Possinno. The wayback machine does not lie!!

New Company Watch
Company Name Symbol
Junum.com, Inc. JUNM
Thaon Communications, Inc. THAO
Inforetech Wireless Technology, Inc. WYRE

web.archive.org
------------------------------------------------------

"Funny, we did not know they were that big.  Actually, the CFO of the former parent of Spear and Jackson had never even heard of Sherb and Co.  Maybe that is because the majority of Sherb’s clients are OTC companies that trade below .25 cents.  Stocklemon’s favorite client of Sherb is WYRE, the boiler room stock of Adnan Kashoggi and Regis Possinno. " Message 19098931



To: afrayem onigwecher who wrote (11806)7/10/2003 4:37:32 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 19428
 
FINAL JUDGMENTS SETTING DISGORGEMENT, PREJUDGMENT INTEREST AND A CIVIL
PENALTY ENTERED AGAINST EDUARDO VILLAR AND WAYNE PRICHASON

The Commission announced that on July 7 the U.S. District Court for the
Southern District of Florida entered Final Judgments Setting
Disgorgement, Prejudgment Interest and a Civil Penalty (Final Judgments)
against Eduardo Villar (Villar) and Wayne Prichason (Prichason). The
Final Judgments entered against Villar and Prichason order them to
disgorge $151,094 and $142,215, respectively, plus prejudgment interest,
which represents the ill-gotten proceeds they received as a result of
their participation in an unregistered fraudulent offering of securities
issued by Web Hosting Headquarters Partnership (Web Hosting). The Final
Judgments further impose a civil penalty in the amount of $110,000
against both Villar and Prichason.

On Dec. 28, 2000, the SEC filed an emergency action against Villar,
Prichason and others seeking to enjoin the alleged ongoing fraudulent
securities offering being conducted by Web Hosting, a Miami, Florida
boiler-room and its principals and telemarketers. Among other things,
the SEC's complaint alleges that the boiler-room, failed to disclose to
investors that it was controlled by individuals with a prior history of
defrauding investors, and that it had diverted at least 62% of funds
raised from investors to pay its principals and telemarketers.
According to the Commission's complaint, Villar served as "Initial
Managing Partner" of Web Hosting and Prichason was a manager of the
boiler-room sales operation. [SEC v. Web Hosting Headquarters
Partnership, Donald E. Roades, Kenneth R. Grossfeld, Wayne L. Prichason,
Eduardo Villar and Karyn Miller, et al., Case No. 00-4975-CIV-HIGHSMITH-
TURNOFF, SD Fla.] (LR-18224)

JUDGMENT OF PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND OTHER RELIEF ENTERED AGAINST WEB HOSTING
HEADQUARTERS PARTNERSHIP

The Commission announced that on April 21, 2003, the U.S. District Court
for the Southern District of Florida entered a Judgment of Permanent
Injunction and Other Relief (Judgment) against Web Hosting Headquarters
Partnership (Web Hosting or The Company). The Judgment, entered by the
consent of the Court-appointed Receiver for Web Hosting and without
admitting or denying the allegations of the Complaint, enjoins The
Company from violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c) and 17(a) of the
Securities Act, Sections 10(b) of the Exchange Act, and Rule 10b-5
thereunder.

On Dec. 28, 2000, the SEC filed an emergency action against Web Hosting
and others seeking to enjoin the alleged ongoing fraudulent securities
offering being conducted by Web Hosting and its principals and
telemarketers. Among other things, the SEC's Complaint alleged that Web
Hosting failed to disclose to investors that it was controlled by
individuals with a prior history of defrauding investors, and that it
had diverted at least 62% of funds raised from investors to pay its
principals and telemarketers. [SEC v. Web Hosting Headquarters
Partnership, Donald E. Roades, Kenneth R. Grossfeld, Wayne L. Prichason,
Eduardo Villar and Karyn Miller, et al., Case No. 00-4975-CIV-HIGHSMITH-
TURNOFF, SD Fla.] (LR-18225)



To: afrayem onigwecher who wrote (11806)7/11/2003 10:50:35 AM
From: StockDung  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 19428
 
SEC Freezes Assets of Michael Lauer's Hedge Funds (Update2)

July 11 (Bloomberg) -- The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission froze the assets of Michael Lauer's Lancer Management Group LLC, saying the hedge fund manager overvalued his portfolio in violation of securities laws.

Lauer, who worked on Wall Street as an analyst before founding his own firm in 1994, inflated the performance and value of his funds, which he claimed exceeded $1 billion in assets, the SEC alleged in papers filed in Federal Court in the Southern District of Florida. The SEC has stepped up its scrutiny of hedge funds and last year examined 12 separate cases of possible fraud.

Lauer ``systematically manipulated the month-end prices of certain securities held by the funds to overstate the value in the funds' holdings in virtually worthless companies,'' the SEC said in a statement on its Web site.

The SEC alleges Lauer made false statements in his offering documents and engaged in fraudulent practices to entice new investors and keep current investors in the fund. The court issued an `emergency order'' to freeze the assets of Lauer's funds and appointed Marty Steinberg, a lawyer at Hunton & Williams LLP in Miami, to safeguard the funds, the SEC said in its statement.

Lauer wasn't available for comment at his New York office. A hearing is set for July 18, the SEC said in its statement.

The SEC in May began a wider review of the hedge fund industry -- loosely regulated private partnerships open only to institutions and individuals worth at least $1 million -- to determine whether greater oversight is required. One SEC concern is how hedge funds value portfolios, especially how they price securities that don't trade regularly, much like some of Lauer's holdings.

Investor Lawsuits

The increase in alleged fraud corresponds with the industry's growth. About 3,500 new hedge funds opened during the past five years and there are now about 6,000 funds worldwide, according to Tremont Advisers Inc. in Rye, New York. Assets have soared to about $620 billion from about $50 billion in 1990.

Some investors had anticipated problems at Lauer's offshore and domestic funds at the end of last year and sought to withdraw about $360 million, or more than a third of Lancer's total reported assets. The run began last year after the firm's auditors raised questions about how the 47-year-old Lauer valued Lancer's holdings.

Faced with lawsuits from investors including investment bank Morgan Stanley, Lauer in April put his domestic fund into voluntary bankruptcy.

Thinly Traded

Lauer started his firm saying he would make money trading in small companies ignored by other investors. Some of the companies he invested in were Simex Technologies Inc., Cross Media Marketing Corp., Lighthouse Fast Ferry Inc. and Continental Southern Resources Inc. The shares, priced at less than $10, trade thinly on over-the-counter markets, if at all.

In 1996, Lauer's Lancer Offshore fund told investors it rose 130 percent in its first full year, compared with the 16.5 percent gain of the Russell 2000, the benchmark index for small-cap stocks.

Before founding Lancer Management, Lauer worked more than a decade as an analyst at brokerages including Kidder Peabody & Co. He specialized in industrial, defense, aerospace and technology companies, and was named to Institutional Investor Magazine's All- American Research Team every year from 1987 to 1993.

Last Updated: July 11, 2003 08:42 EDT



To: afrayem onigwecher who wrote (11806)7/11/2003 10:58:55 AM
From: StockDung  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 19428
 
SPEAR & JACKSON INC (SJCK)6.17 ê 5.39 (-46.63%)