Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Heinz Blasnik- Views You Can Use -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GraceZ who wrote (2850)	6/29/2003 11:28:48 PM
From: LLCF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4907

<You've tried to deny everything, but slowly you're having to give ground as all your myths are being exposed.> ROFLMAO!!!! Should I change my name to 'mythman'? I think it's taken. <It has everything to do with it. To claim to the contrary is to claim the St Louis Fed is trying to deceive the Ny Fed> That assertion is ludicrious. That market simply reflects expectations in the market place about where fed funds are going. <The St Louis Fed includes that graph because it shows how the futures market reacts to what occurs in response to material transactions in the bond market when FED enters. There is no deviation between the two.> No deviation between what to??? Are you asserting that the St. Louis fed fixes the future funds rate?? I would like to know specifically why you think a lower forward funds rate means the fed is following? <<Looks like they go both ways lately, If you admit this, your claim that "it looks to me like even the data you provided does not show the fed 'proping' the funds rate up on net" has to be false.>> That's complete bullshit. How is going both ways tantamount to holding rates up? <You're missing everything.> Well, I HAVE to be... for ego's survival sake. <<It's all the same subject. I can't help it if you can't retain what has been stated. I'll state it again, but your prejudices which come from the mass of myths you have, won't accept what has been demonstrated, so your ego will force you to miss it again: The real estate market strength isn't coming from FED's creation of money supply. Money supply is currently disconnected with interest rates.>> I never even addressed that topic Grace... so apparently my ego harbours one less prejudice than you thought. The only thing I've addressed is the issue of the fed, let's cut to the chase... how long do you think the fed as been 'following' rates down... let's just say how many bps? DAK