Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tom Clarke who wrote (2948)	6/30/2003 8:03:13 PM
From: JohnM	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793895

Oops. Can I blame it on multi-tasking? My skimming skills aren't what they used to be... The sentence, in my case, always reads "none of my skills are what they used to be." I was struck by the existence of the article. Why would such a story be leaked? Is it what it purports to be, a simple indiscretion from a Bush or Pataki official, just wanting to see their words in a newspaper article? Or is part of some sort of plant? As in Schumer's got a ton of money, how do we slow down his contributions, well one way is to make it look as if he isn't going to have a genuine opponent. So he'll have a harder time raising money. Then spring some one on him who is strong at the last moment. I get to that convoluted stuff by looking at the idiotic strategy. Why feel they can carry New York if the Schumer turnout is low? Well, no answers or possible. But it's fun to rack up the questions. And, looking at the issue from the standpoint of the NY Rep party, I agree with you. Which doesn't address the motives of the Bush people and why, most interestingly of all, if the article is right, Pataki would go along with it. Unless he wants to run and wants to spring it on everyone at th e last moment. But that doesn't make sense. Just running in circles.