Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Knighty Tin who wrote (247903)	7/1/2003 11:15:09 AM
From: stockman_scott	Respond to of 436258

Hostages of the empire ___________________________________ By Andrew Murray Comment The Guardian Tuesday July 1, 2003 The words of Paul Bremer, Washington's overlord in Iraq, need no "sexing up". "We are going to fight them and impose our will on them and we will capture or... kill them until we have imposed law and order on this country," he declared at the weekend. "We dominate the scene and we will continue to impose our will on this country." Neither General Dyer at Amritsar nor General Westmoreland in Vietnam could have put it any clearer. Welcome to the new colonialism. Bremer's words are not just bluster. US forces are now engaged in massive search-and-destroy sweeps in central and northern Iraq against forces opposing their rule. While the Westminster village remains riveted by the Campbell-BBC pillow fight, it is the real war on the ground in Iraq that should be commanding our attention. The six British soldiers killed last week, like the US servicemen under daily attack, are victims of an overbearing and inept occupation policy that is alienating ordinary Iraqis of all persuasions. Civilian deaths, particularly of demonstrators, are mounting. Basic services and basic rights are in scant supply, with neither democracy nor a reliable water supply on offer to Iraqis. The only advanced programme is for the privatisation of state industry. This occupation, which has no modern precedent, should be at the centre of political attention. Ending it needs to be at the heart of public activity. Tony Blair has placed Britain at the service of the first major post-1991 attempt to fasten foreign domination by force on a sovereign country, an endeavour as unlawful as it is unwise. And there is no easy way out for the government. British troops in Iraq are now hostages to the Middle East policy of the Bush administration and its boundless appetite for domination. As the occupation of Iraq increasingly appears to be a springboard for a fresh regime-change offensive against Iran, the British troops controlling the Shia-dominated south of Iraq will be seen not merely as uninvited occupiers but as aggressors against their co-religionists as well. If the recent warnings of Washington uberhawks Condoleezza Rice and John Bolton - that military action against Iran is a live option - become fact, British forces will be caught up in the campaign, like it or not. And how often have the musings of maniacs become official Bush administration policy faster than you can say "pre-emptive war"? It is certainly hard to see Bush willingly withdrawing the forces of his "coalition" from Iraq without first having a crack at toppling the Iranian government. Indeed, the US has no strategy for pacifying Iraq that does not involve challenging Iran. Thus is the traditional logic of 19th-century empire being replayed in the 21st: protecting one conquest requires an indefinite extension of conflict. Tony Blair seems to be up for this - committed as he is to his own version of the "white man's burden", imposing New Labour values of market efficiency and moral hectoring on the world for its own good. He shows no signs whatever of wanting to unhook Britain from George Bush's endless war against the "axis of evil" and beyond. Geoff Hoon, for example, when not pledging thousands more troops to the Iraqi quagmire, has signalled a British willingness to sign up for the entirely lawless and manifestly dangerous US plan to board and search by force North Korean ships on the high seas. But are the millions who marched against the Iraq war ready to acquiesce in the continuing, connected crises of the Iraqi occupation and plans for renewed war? Parliament may be dozing; but the public is increasingly alarmed. The anti-war movement is once again gaining momentum, its aim both to prevent the next war and indict the government for the now transparent lies it told to justify the last one. But it is also to work for Iraq to be returned to the Iraqis, lifting the burden of Bremer's bullying from the backs of a suffering country. It is time for British politics - the labour movement above all - to wake up to what is being done in our name. Last week's killings in Majar al-Kabir will be only the beginning unless the government is held to account for its subordination to the "new American century" project. Dead British soldiers - but no weapons of mass destruction discovered. The balance sheet of Blair's Iraq adventure is deteriorating fast. Yet the prime minister is to accept a Congressional gold medal for his part in imposing George Bush's will on Iraq. He will not be doing so on behalf of the British people. Perhaps Alastair Campbell should recommend a private ceremony. · Andrew Murray is chair of the Stop the War Coalition. guardian.co.uk

To: Knighty Tin who wrote (247903)	7/1/2003 11:19:25 AM
From: Earlie	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 436258

MB: I'm off for cross-country trip to take the temperature of the eastern U.S.. A week or so of amateur diagnostic effort. Will probably spend a bit more time than usual delving into the transportation scene as the semi situation is so rank that the smell of rotting inventories alone tells the stinky tale. (g) Normally I don't like to go off on such trips with major exposure, but "this time it is different", as I am fairly well exposed to the short side of the semis and the airlines. I think there was a ton of effort put into holding things up for the quarter end and that with this behind us, selling will dominate. We shall see. Best, Earlie