SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: stockman_scott who wrote (247919)7/1/2003 12:39:07 PM
From: Oblomov  Respond to of 436258
 
>>administration that currently is recklessly managing our deficit...

Scott, I agree to some degree. I am in favor of the income tax cuts, but I think that there should have been corresponding spending cuts or an offsetting increase in corporate taxes.

Buffett, Soros, and Pete Petersen are not conservative. Wealthy, yes. Conservative in the sense of "interested in preserving the status quo", maybe. But not conservative in the sense of the modern American usage.



To: stockman_scott who wrote (247919)7/1/2003 2:06:08 PM
From: Andy Thomas  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 436258
 
and if tax cuts are so great for the economy, why not cut taxes to zero... better yet, why not have the fed pay us?



To: stockman_scott who wrote (247919)7/1/2003 6:28:11 PM
From: Mike M2  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 436258
 
SS, the deficits are due to a decline in tax revenue - look at the 50 states and their budget problems. People's incomes have declined retirees have seen their interest income extinguished while property taxes escalate. Their retirement portfolios have been hit. The taxpayer must learn to live with less so should the government. mike


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News